News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

weft

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous on Saturday April 19, 2025 @11:15PM (#43741269)
There's no "logic" here, you're just not aware of the history of the term and the sociological history behind it.

The nuclear family was an oddity that developed in England concomitant to the Industrial Revolution in middle-class families for whom occupational relocation was common. It was enshrined as an ideal sociological familial arrangement in the United States because its normalization was conducive for developing larger pools of productive labor.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous on Saturday April 19, 2025 @11:08PM (#43741245)
It's not even the most stable or ubiquitous family arrangement in the modern day.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous on Saturday April 19, 2025 @11:07PM (#43741240)
That distinction is what defines a "nuclear family" to begin with...
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous on Saturday April 19, 2025 @11:04PM (#43741231)
"Nuclear" here is in reference to households with only mother, father, and children, in distinction to the norm of multigenerational households throughout history and in most of the world today excepting the West.
Re:Procrastination and the fear of not being good enough on Monday November 18, 2024 @02:29AM (#42170486)
Did I miss where they claimed absolute perfection in shedding their egotism or something? Because this interpretation of self-reformation after an actually humbling admission of having once lived in devotion to narcissism as being braggartry is what screams insecure egotism to me.