wdh505
The book also proposes that spouses who are compatible tend to have complimentary areas of genius and frustration.
More to your point: if someone has an area of frustration to discern what course of action will fix, and you have that as an area of genius, then be kind about it as you probably got married because there are other ways you complement each other.
https://blog.dejapan.com/2018/08/life-in-japan/gatebox-ai-vi...
I'll be curious about it, but I think that climate change may slow more from lower cost land surface batteries than these electrolysis water splitting batteries and associated ecosystems. Aka I won't hold my breath... ba dum tsss
There is a trend of pet humanization. Hamster owners can install cameras and see what nocturnal hamsters are up to at night. The hamster owners anthropomorphize the actions as 'human routines' or a personal hamster reality TV.
‐------
Interesting stuff
I know of several groups that have the best of all worlds for a painful learning cost: apprenticeships. I know that the typical job growth of a apprentice involves doing your tasks, anticipating, then moving to management if you have the propensity toward that. The most intense desk jobs of the accounting world is the "big 4" which have 2 cycles: boom and consolidate/bust.
The boom cycle promotes the technical "senior" to the management position and requires the manager to review the work of the guy who just got promoted to senior. The manager becomes more concerned about roi over time and eventually goes into sales/estimating.
The consolidating cycle is where the fat is cut because it is "up or out" to maintain a pyramid structure. Those who get the boot often manage well (due to the high exposure) and are confident when starting a apprenticship business of their own (have technical and management and client service skills)
This pattern is similar for all apprenticeships I think like plumbers, cement masons, accountants, etc. The work product is well known, the skills are transferable, and correctness are easily observed by others with the skill.
The pain is when a manager takes tips from a "competent manager" as defined in the article who then has subordinates prioritize low roi activities like formatting or making it clean from sawdust before closing a wall up. Soon a roi-focused manager will look over the competent-manager's shoulder and say why is your team slow, and the answer is "they are slower than me (because they are being trained to look pretty) and i am telling them to work fast, maybe I need to tell them that they are low performing" and turnover increases until that manager stops training people as the manager isn't the client.
- source happened to my relatives grids a few times, and they got pretty cynical to the "tax" imposed to get nuclear then no nuclear.
https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-7/high-tech-industries-a...
Perhaps they will analyze the tech employment soon?
The average weekly wage is 1200$. Seems like what most master degrees can command. Oof. The median is probably much lower.
Investment restricted to "government responsibility foresight" infrastructure gets enough flac already. It only takes one down turn for the "golden goose" of the investment to be spent on the buddies of who just got into office
- my sarcasm agreeing with you.
"Remember that no matter what you do, there is always an Asian better than you. And this applies even if you are an Asian."
-my sarcastic Asian friend in college
"If you re not first, you're last" -rickybobby
I have found that MBTI is generally considered pseudoscience and survey nonsense that has small correlation to anything with the preference for "big 5" instead. This definitely decreases the "ah ha!" feeling I had when reading this article.
My understanding of the article is that this is not a giant framework to try and "categorize the world" like MBTI, but is a way to help the people who have difficulty communicating without being deemed "awkward" to think about the neuroscience and the strengths that they can focus on instead.
Maybe Ill look up any studies performed over P & J to see if it is correlated with anything other than "awkward" predictions.
I can't tell enough from your comment to see if you found any characteristic other than they talked more than you preferred in a conversation.
To clarify what I understood from the article:
Autism is independent of cognitive mapping based communication styles, but it definitely makes difficulties in communication more intense especially when all communication styles are lumped into the same bucket. When considering neurotypical people, the way language is processed (left brian vs right brain) is often based on the "default" for the language. Here is an oversimplification of two languages, but the "default" seems to fit:
- American Sign Language is a visual and idea based language that tends to have more "weaver" right brain, "no point" communications. The Grammar focuses on "what and How".
- English is a auditory and command based language that tends to have more "concluder" left brain, "get to the point" communications. The grammar focues on "Who did it and why"
Improv classes increase "creative pathways" in the right brain. Others who are more right brained, may engage in "planning and resource allocation classes" to stimulate language usage in the left brain. Ability to "get to the point" and ability to "creatively improv" are both crucial skills, and by default as we speak english, the average person in class may need more "improv" classes to be successful. (you are an individual and not equal to "average", so this doesn't quite apply to you)