vz0
Re:Exec($_GET
on Tuesday April 29, 2014 @03:07AM (#7665445)
What about phpMyAdmin and others alike webapps? Are they inherently insecure?
Re:Freelancer.com is destroying my life
on Sunday April 27, 2014 @03:09PM (#7656314)
in Argentina a passport costs ~$150 (ARS) but you have the choice of paying 10x (~$1000) and getting the document on the next working 24hs.
Linux terminal keylogger in userspace
How to fund a non-IT idea?
We have a great idea, already patented on the US and Europe. It is a medical device.We did ask lots of companys for funding, but the answer has always been a negative one.How can we get help?
Re:Confession of a Haskell Hacker
on Monday July 09, 2012 @03:31AM (#4217109)
Find the type of:
fix x = x x
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++
on Thursday May 10, 2012 @12:23PM (#3954318)
GCC is finally switching from C to C++, and they are actually avoiding exceptions and RTTI.
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CppConventions
I salute them on following strict coding conventions.
Re:Why should I have written ZeroMQ in C, not C++
on Thursday May 10, 2012 @10:26AM (#3953639)
I agree, this is just a rant on C++.
Coming from Java world, I can tell that it is nice being able to raise exceptions from the constructor.
However, switching from C++ to C is absurd. C++ is (mostly) a super set of C. Whatever you want to do in C, in C++ is also possible.
If there are some C++ features (exceptions, classes, contructors, etc.) that are making his coding task more complicated, he should simply stop using those features and refactor his code.
Oh Yelp, why can't we quit you.
The Tablet Prediction, 1930s
Toro Kernel - x86 - x86_64 - OpenRisc Kernel
Re:Intel's take on GCC's memcpy implementation
on Thursday November 03, 2011 @11:18AM (#3192152)
Anger Fog found this issue one year earlier, 2008: