News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

voxxit

Re:Disappearing Jobs... Computer Programmers? on Saturday October 09, 2010 @04:10PM (#1775734)
I call bull.
Re:Costco deal: $800 for a year’s worth of 'food' on Friday October 08, 2010 @11:50AM (#1772046)
Couldn't one send this kind of stuff to a third-world country as a donation? It could help feed a starving family for 3-4 months, no?
Re:Microsoft Buying Adobe? on Thursday October 07, 2010 @07:11PM (#1769890)
God help us.
Re:MongoDB's lead developer: Foursquare outage post mortem on Thursday October 07, 2010 @07:10PM (#1769888)
Why they have only two database servers running (with their database in memory, no less) with 200 million check-ins, is completely beyond me.
Re:Ask HN: recommendations for domain registrars on Wednesday October 06, 2010 @11:06PM (#1766699)
Shameless plug: try out http://core.hostroute.com. I personally think our domain lookup tool is the best I've used. I've probably used them all ;-)
Re:Man jailed over computer password refusal on Tuesday October 05, 2010 @03:20PM (#1761026)
It is probably just a concatenated string of his credit card number or social security number and random words. I wonder if they are currently trying to crack it using some kind of dictionary brute force mechanism, or if there is some kind of lock out enabled after five tries.

Ask HN: How important is a phone number on your site?

A little background: a company I work for has been up and running (profitably) for about ten years now. However, they have reached a plateau, and we're brainstorming on ideas which could get more money in the door.One idea which I brought to the table: simply putting our freaking phone number on our website and asking people to call. We've have a number of customers saying how great it is when...

( Read More... | 12 comments | 14 points | on HN )
Re:Making AJAX applications crawlable on Friday October 01, 2010 @08:26PM (#1749304)
I just recently implemented this. The thing I'm having trouble with is the fact that they don't limit the amount of time (or specify a limit, rather) which is acceptable to make the crawler wait. For instance, what if it take 20 seconds to load an acceptable amount of JavaScript-created HTML?
Re:MyHurricane, Stormpulse now has an HTML5 competitor. on Thursday September 23, 2010 @08:15AM (#1719318)
I've got it down as a feature request. I'll keep it in mind. Thanks!
Re:MyHurricane, Stormpulse now has an HTML5 competitor. on Thursday September 23, 2010 @08:14AM (#1719315)
Fixed the scrollwheel issue, and allowed you to zoom in further.

The reason the zooming out is limited is because of the area which is required to legibly see the markers, labels, etc.

Re:MyHurricane, Stormpulse now has an HTML5 competitor. on Thursday September 23, 2010 @01:01AM (#1718633)
Thanks for the link! I'm very open for any technology questions, concerns, feature/other suggestions you all may have.
Re:Ruby 1.9.1 Released: First Stable Ruby 1.9 Release on Friday January 30, 2009 @05:07PM (#458789)
Technically, you could check your gems, see which ones are not 1.9 compatible, fix the gems, and then release. :)