vitaminCPP
vitaminCPP on Hacker News
Hehe thank you for that. It made me laughed.
I fully agree of course.
I'm always impressed by Zig's targets support. I'm starting to think that it might be the only language that competes with C on this regard.
I'm looking forward to see what the new build integration can unlock on the tooling side.
What I'm looking for the most for the next release(s):
- New stackless coroutine IO implementation
- First class fuzzer tooling
You should not worry. They said they would make a short release cycle for updating to 23.
Love it.
I wish it included zig.
In what way, if you don't mind me asking?
This looks awesome. Do you have video show casing you diagnosing a problem with it?
Posted by
vitaminCPP on Wednesday July 15, 2026 @12:45PM
from the github.com dept.
Agreed. This blog post strikes the balance between PR-speak and x.com
I've read somewhere that the longer-term goal is to move the build system into a WebAssembly VM. If so, this is incredible.
I don't know men. I do hang out in the handmade Discord from time to time, and Bill has not been very kind, to say the least.
Maybe I just met him on a bad day.
Hehe it's always Lemire !
Yep. How will we manage those 10x code projects, when LLMs cost increases by 10x?
We got memory safety at home !
At home:
> 10428
> +1009257 -4024
Bun is now over 1M lines of Rust code.
This is approaching the size of the Rust compiler itself; except that BunJs is mostly a JavaScript interpreter wrapper + a reimplementation of the NodeJS library (Rust STD wrapper).
I think BunJS is becoming the canary for software complexity management in the LLM era.
For embedded/kernel programmers: Is there a linux equivalent of this book?
+1 The zig toolchain is the state of the art currently.
For me, it's the toolchain.
The Zig cross-compiler is beyond anything I've seen.
Yeah that was my also my thought.
I always understood that if you give a thread to each actor you get the "active object" design pattern.
I fail to see why this would not work with gcc if it works with clang. The runtime?
Please don't use js in medical devices.
As a professional C programmer, the answer seems to be no; they are not good enough.
This is a good advice.
That said, I don't think you should care about people that comments on articles without reading them.
> they do it using either a parallel functional language or a parallel library in modern C++.
IMO this is a weakness not a strength.
The approach of Fleury (low level C, no lib), makes his articles a lot more valuable for understanding fundamentals.
This is exactly what the article is trying to debunk.
I can't wait for the SD25 videos!