News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

vijayshankarv

Re:Exploring Brazil's Remnant Atlantic Forest on Sunday December 24, 2023 @10:11PM (#38759323)
It does seem like quite a lot of the original area has been lost

> Five hundred years ago, the Atlantic Forest of Brazil covered approximately 330 million acres (about twice the size of Texas), but today more than 85% of this forest has been cleared and what remains is highly fragmented.

https://www.nature.org/en-us/get-involved/how-to-help/places...

Has the name of the field changed to acoustic ecology now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_ecology

I've been listening to this interview of Gordon Hempton and the whole field is quite fascinating - https://onbeing.org/programs/gordon-hempton-silence-and-the-...

Re:Tired of note-taking apps on Sunday July 19, 2020 @12:23PM (#23890367)
I really liked Andy Matuschak's article “Better note-taking” misses the point; what matters is “better thinking” - https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7kEFe6NfUSgtaDuUjST1oczKKzQ...

Over the years, I have also moved from one app to another when it comes to note-taking. Frankly, I was using them more as a place to put things that I might want to refer to later than using them to think about the problems that I was trying to solve.

Personally, I find that there are times when I need more of a free flowing format like paper or an iPad, but most of the time, text suffices. For the last six months or so, I have been using Roam Research and related apps(Obsidian) and they do really help me evolve a structure around my thoughts without having to have one when I am starting out.

Re:Ask HN: How do you prioritize things to read? on Saturday May 23, 2020 @08:49PM (#23288087)
Don't worry too much about prioritization if your goal from reading is to learn. Set aside some time and then pick whatever article/book you most feel like reading and just get going. If it bores you, then stop and move on to the next one.

For interesting articles, take notes using a system that works for you. Progressive Summarization and Zettelkasten are good ideas.

Over time, you will realize that most articles and books are not worth the time investment to deeply read them and get quicker at skimming to get the gist.

Some useful links:

Better note-taking misses the point -https://notes.andymatuschak.org/z7kEFe6NfUSgtaDuUjST1oczKKzQ...

Gutting books - https://twitter.com/varsha_venkat_/status/110774091578163609...

https://hash.ai/

Hash is a platform for simulation and I think this kind of stuff will become increasingly important.

I would love to join a reading group (on slack or another messaging platform) on this book.
Thanks! This looks like what I will start with. Can't find your email in your profile, though.
That's great! I did not know that the exercises appeared in book form until I found it a used book store. Read through most of the lectures in undergrad/grad school but needs a revisit.
I know a few people who have stayed in academia and done this.

In my case, my partner is not in academia which makes it a bit easier.

Condensed matter physics PhD (2016) now working in the software industry as a data scientist.

Focused on modelling/simulating materials during my thesis and realized that I loved the software aspect of things and did not love working on the same problem for many months at a time.

As others mentioned, transitioning to data science is not that hard if you have a physics background and there are many interesting problems to solve in the area.Most of my graduate student peers are also in data science/ML and related areas (software/finance).

Although money was a contributing factor, the main reasons to leave academia were being able to live in a city that I liked and where my partner could also find a position.

Did not look back on physics at all for the first couple of years post-PhD, but missing it quite a bit nowadays. End up buying a lot of Physics books every year, although don't get through many of them. Latest purchase was Exercises for the Feynman lectures.

Oh wow! This looks like the physics book that I always wanted to read. Phd 2016 in condensed matter physics - now working in a mid-size (~600 people) software company as a data scientist.
Re:A Lifetime of Systems Thinking on Monday January 21, 2019 @04:51PM (#18963941)
If you found Peter Senge's book practical you would probably like Thinking in Systems. It takes a few systems archetypes and explores them in reasonable detail and has charts of simulations. I browse through my copy every once in a while when thinking about a problem, and it often sheds some light on the problem.

Before reading this book, I did not think much about delays but now I try to identify them as soon as possible.

Re:A Lifetime of Systems Thinking on Monday January 21, 2019 @04:46PM (#18963900)
While your comment about people picking on education does hold true, I don't think the way the child learns from her parents is similar to what is done at school. Here, the child tries to speak on her own and gets a lots of feedback from her parents that help her get better at it.

If you haven't read any of John Holt's books, they might interest you.

Re:Ask HN: Why did you choose to have children? on Saturday March 03, 2018 @01:45PM (#16510810)
Are there any women in this thread? As a male, would love to know more about the female perspective.