varunagrawal
My VS Code Playground
How to Export and Import GitHub Issue Labels Between Projects
FDA Says Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine Meets Success Criteria
Pylustrator – Prepare your figures for publication in a reproducible way
Anti-Racism Resources
Winget – Windows Package Manager CLI
Covid-19 Charts
Covid-19 Awareness Icons from FontAwesome
(A Few) Ops Lessons We All Learn the Hard Way
Loguru – Python logging made (stupidly) simple
GitHub is down for some users
Bbox – a Python library for 2D/3D bounding boxes
Bistring – Bidirectionally Transformed Strings
Minkowski Engine
The Type-Safe Builder Pattern in Java, and the Jilt Library
Original paper on how to reconstruct an image of a Black Hole [pdf]
Bbox – Python library for working with bounding boxes
Bbox – Python library for working with bounding boxes
CUDA 10.0
Re:Ask HN: Should we waive technical interviews if candidate contributes?
on Saturday September 01, 2018 @09:37AM (#17891773)
I like this way of doing things. Some people are brilliant and very good at general communication but just don't interview well due to various factors. This sort of free form conversation should put them at ease as well.
Re:Ask HN: Should we waive technical interviews if candidate contributes?
on Saturday September 01, 2018 @09:36AM (#17891765)
We don't see this happening for tech jobs, and at the worst, interviewers will still ask programming language specific questions. Plus "meaningful patch" might mean different things to different people.
Ask HN: Should we waive technical interviews if candidate contributes?
If a candidate contributes a code related patch to a company's open source project, should that serve as enough justification to the interviewer that the candidate has technical prowess in order to waive a technical interview?This would IMO be a better gauge of technical quality over white-board interviews.
Drawing and Animating Shapes with Matplotlib
Computer Vision in the Browser for Web Developers
Geoffrey Hinton spent 30 years on an idea many other scientists dismissed
Re:Let’s write a simple Kernel (2014)
on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:47AM (#15514594)
Am I the only one who's pretty much done with reading these sort of rinse and repeat articles about just writing a bootloader in the name of a kernel?