varbhat
I have created an MCP server for the Linux desktop. It gives AI access to the Linux desktop. I developed this with the assistance of the AI.
desktopmcp connects AI assistants to the Linux desktop through three system interfaces: XDG Desktop Portals for desktop operations, AT-SPI for semantic UI understanding, and D-Bus for low-level system access. It exposes 144 tools over the Model Context Protocol, letting an AI see what's on screen, understand UI structure, move cursor, click buttons, type text, manage files, operate inputs and interact with desktop services.
Falsehoods CS Students (Still) Believe Upon Graduating
In my opinion, not everything requires a native app. AI Chat assistants are completely fine to be used in the web browser. for most used applications like slack, I do have native application( even slack which is website in a shell is completely usable as a desktop application). What i really don't understand is the benefit of a ChatGPT native application other than native widgets instead of web elements.
I read about Passkey comittee being against open source passkey managers during start of this year (can't reference it, sorry) but with open source password/key managers already supporting passkeys, i don't think it turned out to be true.
someone has to pay for the servers at the end. are you asking for openai to subsidize ChatGPT Pro for low-income countries? Since OpenAI is for-profit entity focussed on profits, I don't think it might be a wise idea financially for OpenAI to do so.
Better switch to Linux. It's not perfect but I am sure that you will be fine using Linux(Unless you want to use Adobe Suite or Few Corporate applications which won't be used by many)
Basically a DaisyUI, but with looks of Bootstrap or Semantic-UI
I am happy for helix but i don't think it's a good fit for me.
I use Neovim. It does what i want it to do. It's one of the best available options. But, i am not completely satisfied with it. I personally want an editor with following:
* Modern codebase. Written from scratch.
* VIM Keybindings: I have muscle memory of Vim. I would like to use Vim Keybindings in my editor. I don't want to use any other keybindings even if they are proclaimed to be better. It must walk like vim and quack like vim.
* Good defaults. I hate configuring a lot. Neovim requires configuring a lot and need not always provide good defaults if it provided. Helix might have gotten this right.
* Based on Treesitter. Better they run Treesitter parsers as a WASM in WASM runtime just like how Zed and latest Neovim do.
* Extension System. But, I don't really favor lua, js or scheme. They just aren't my cup of tea. Maybe make it a wasm module with only necessary functions exposed to it. And configuration of those plugins in non turning complete configuration language.
* TUI and optional GUI
* LSP,DAP and Snippets support built-in(along with auto complete/suggestions, UI for Testing and Debugging)
* Oil.nvim like FS as buffer built-in
* Telescope/FZF-lua style Search built-in
* Git integration built-in (Maybe magit/neogit like GIT UI is welcome)
* Flash.nvim style Treesitter based Code AST Manipulation and Jump-to by label built-in
* Macros and Multi cursors
* Optional Cursor Style AI integration (Chat UI)
Subsecond: A runtime hotpatching engine for Rust hot-reloading
https://ajv.js.org is one such JSON Schema library. How does zod compare to this?
I do think that X220 is a great laptop because despite its age, it still runs great.
But, tbh, i don't think that it holds up well in terms of performance if we compare it to any modern laptop.
What we do want is a modern laptop which is open source friendly, has a great battery life, is repair-friendly, has a good hardware. Do Framework laptops fit this criteria? I don't know. I also do hear that the modern Thinkpads are good but they used to be better, years back.