uto
Re:Active NPN Supply Chain Attack on `Nx` Package
on Thursday August 28, 2025 @01:34AM (#45048758)
I observed a VS Code plugin compromise itself after running: "npx exec nx@latest --version".
Is it really that easy to get infected, or am I missing a more dangerous step it took? If this behavior is common, doesn’t it mean you could be exposed even without using a vulnerable plugin version, since it auto-runs @latest scripts just to check the version?
Re:Apple: We're not handing over Safari URLs to Tencent, just IP addre...
on Monday October 14, 2019 @11:14PM (#21255258)
They already started censoring the emoji keyboard in HK, this would be even easier to justify as it is "protecting the user".
Re:What are some good Linux friendly laptops?
on Thursday April 25, 2019 @02:56AM (#19745676)
I've been running Fedora 29 on the Surface Pro 4 for a month or so now. I agree this form factor is almost perfect for a laptop. The screen and keyboard are great for coding.
I'm not sure if I'd recommend this as a primary work machine since you have to compile your own kernel to enable some of the features (touch screen, hibernation etc). Other than that it's been stable and better than I had anticipated.
Re:German federal office publishes Windows 10 telemetry analysis
on Sunday November 25, 2018 @08:12PM (#18530253)
Pi-hole seems to block windows telemetry domains by default. I don't know how complete the blocking is but there are a lot of domains like the ones listed in this thread on my top blocked domains list.
Re:Skylake's Linux power management is dreadful you shouldn't buy unti...
on Thursday April 14, 2016 @03:46AM (#11494949)
Interesting. Could you tell which model you have? I have had very few problems in general on my SP4 i7-16GB model. I've had to reset the device maybe once or twice in the last ~4 months.
Re:Show HN: Using Google AMP to build a Medium-style Jekyll site that ...
on Tuesday March 15, 2016 @02:01AM (#11287744)
So what's the best practice when it comes to valid html? This seems like a cool technology but trying to validate the https://www.ampproject.org/ site, the w3c validator fails so bad it's not even able to list all errors. The example post does a bit better but is still pretty far from valid html5.
Is there a way to do it in a standardised way or should that even be desired? All browsers I've tried seem to render it fine and quickly (assuming js and the normal bells and whistles).