urig

I think it's might be possible that "neural networks could form completely incompatible representations of the same reality" except that it's humans who get to decide if a representation is good (i.e. compatible with the human perception of reality) or bad and NNs that differ are dismissed as erroneous.

TLDR - random person shares their gut feeling about how to spot slop. Not useful.

No.

Yeah. This fails to load both in Opera and in Chrome on Android. I'd tone the hyperbole down a bit.

Obvs

100% agree. It's as if you read the first sentence out of my mind. Thanks.

It's only next generation? Anthropic has frontier models! lol

He's right. You don't have to cheat to become a billionaire. Stepping on everybody else's throats is a legit part of the capitalist playbook. No cheating involved.

Don't build a product tour. It is useless friction. Instead, build your UI to be good,simple, obvious. That's it. That's the tweet.

+/- 1 day of nuclear testing because these are old records so dates and times reported might be inaccurate.

You don't have to use the most recent bleeding edge model to succeed. A local FOSS coding agent coupled with a reasonably priced LLM could yield the optimal ROI.

The tracking described is extremely invasive. You say you are not endorsing it but you are certainly normalizing it. This is unacceptable.

The people behind this URL are trying to hold Microsoft accountable. The power to them.

As an Israeli, this is an inexcusable crime by IDF soldiers. Appallingly, I expect them to receive no punishment. My country's government is criminally racist.

Lots and lots of CPUs pooled. Faster more efficient power RAM accessible to both GPU and CPU. IIUC.

What the heck is agentic inference and how is it supposed to be different from LLM inference? That's a rhetorical question. Screw marketing and screw hype.

No, we just outsourced car maintenance to professional shop services. Both because mechanical aspects have become reliable enough to last a year without maintenance and because electronic/computer aspects are mind-bogglingly complicated.

Lost me right about in the middle when he started chirping AI AI AI like a parrot. AI and trust do not go hand in hand. Focus on privacy, transparency and simplicity because instead. Good luck.

That's just irresponsible advice. There is so little actual evidence of this technology being able to produce high quality maintainable code that asking us to trust it blindly is borderline snake-oil peddling.

Long, interesting, and doesn't actually give you a practical way to spot counterfeit. Click-bait.

Bottom line: impressive optics, zero impact for this technology on global warming, it's a distraction.

University of Minnesota Duluth: "Routine maintenance leads to unexpected microbial discovery in “ship goo” on the R/V Blue Heron's rudder shaft."

Central to this article, the author asks: "What if you just... removed the AI part?" and suggests a world of possibilities if we do. I disagree.

MCP is a protocol based on meagre structure and a bulk of human language. Either you use a large-language model to "read" this language, or you get a human to do it. The first is "AI" and the latter is... not very impressive.

I appreciate the artistic and programming skills of the developer but not the "cleverness" and "quirkiness" of their announcement post. It took me too long to figure out that this is some sort of distraction-less writing app only for iOS and so of no value to me. Less snappy memes, more empathy for me as a visitor, please.

My takeaway from this post is not to find better ways to do, but to find a way not to.

That's an "all or nothing" fallacy, easily countered.

One alternative is water. Plus alternative products might be less efficient but less contaminating. Finally, even with Phos-Check, success is far from guaranteed.

Bottom line: the lack of transparency must be remedied and officials need to be aware and factor in heavy metal contamination into their decisions.

I can't believe anyone can fall for this. It's so obviously a modern take on that Rockwell Retro Encabulator joke.

The founder's hyperbole is tiring. The reality I see is about as exciting as reading about another superyacht for the 0.01%. Let me know when this proves economically viable for low cost airfare. Until then, bare in mind that most of the planet can't afford a plane ticket, nevermind the supersonic bit.

Rules are put in place to be followed, for a reason. Capital letters at the start of the sentence increase readability. People who don't bother with them are being incosiderate towards their readers.

You're not the target audience. This is a very well-written explainer for non-techies. I've already emailed it to a couple of friends. Lovely.