ugtr3
Risk seekers should be entrepreneurs.
Risk averse people, probably, should not.
Jobs envisioned the iPad and iPhone. Did he do the physical work? No. But he created direction.
Everyone around him at that time has commented on this. Are you going to claim they’re all lying?
LLM’s are the virus of the mind - people think so what? I get my output and move on.
Yeah.. no. You need that thinking capacity to protect yourself. Once that’s gone en-masse, what’s left of the democratic system (not much) will completely collapse. Congrats to legally creating an environment that yields oligarchy.
Altman and his cronies yearn for a swath of people who cannnot think for themselves.
People who are liberal artsy at the core but do computer science? Yes.
Come on you’re taking the piss, surely.
I’m happy to put money in towards it ;)
And I’m thankful - I’d really hate to rely on something else to get me going…
Without being exposed to this, you’re not gonna be a good problem solver in the long run.
“I'm also concerned about the second-order effects. Because switching into the often-required deep mental focus is very difficult (borderline painful), I've seen many, many people reach for LLMs in those moments instead, first a little, then entirely. I've watched people copy/paste API docs into Gemini prompts to explain them. I've watched people unable to find syntax errors in code and paste it into ChatGPT to fix it. I'm confident I'm not the only person who's observed this, and it's a little maddening it's not getting more play”
That’s exactly why I stopped using LLM’s. Then people turn around and say “but.. you’ll get left behind.”
Yeah, nah. I value my ability to hold concepts and reason deeply and sit in those painful moments - I’m not letting go of this conditioning that pays dividends over the long term.