ueueshitashita
Oh no, the horror!
I get the lemonade stand, but who needs a permit to run a bike shop?
If Twitter really cared about the "lies and hateful rhetoric" they would have put their money where their mouth is and banned him years ago. It's just a meaningless gesture to drum up more drama, more clicks, more views.
They could and have been sued all along. Plenty of people file inane lawsuits against Facebook, Twitter and Google all the time for content that gets posted on their services. I wouldn't be quick to imply that these lawsuits would result in successful outcomes for the plaintiffs would it not have been for the existence of Section 230.
Seeing as plenty of people are earning more with the federal unemployment compensation than they would if they were working full time, I'm not sure what exactly is "unconvincing" about it.
I fill out forms in encrypted PDFs all the time with Preview, never had a problem.
That's the point, the "rock" stars aren't making any money in the industry like other pop acts anymore - they're mostly doing their own thing on Patreon and streaming on Twitch.
Not really in 2020.
Who is "we" in this context?
What if they don't want to be on medication?
> if they are on drugs, get them into a program like NA and give them the medication to combat the withdrawl.
What if they have no interest in doing that?