News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

tvorryn

Re:How to Be a Better Procrastinator on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @02:42PM (#4382447)
There is fairly strong evidence that NLP is not effective: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro-linguistic_programming#Sc...
Re:Exploiting Silicon Valley For Profit (and Maybe Fun) on Thursday June 28, 2012 @12:34AM (#4170366)
If not now, eventually they must be or must have been "doing startups" because all businesses begin as startups. It's in the name, a startup is a company that is just getting started. Some eventually grow up into the titans of industry that we all know.

The parent is wondering why don't we see more entrepreneurs founding companies that look like they could become the next titans of industry. It seems to me that their companies either don't exist, or are currently invisible because they haven't begun gobbling up market share.

Re:Amazon Digital Markup: 129,000% on Wednesday June 13, 2012 @09:03AM (#4105643)
Most US authors pay only a few cents per delivery. [1] Books with lots of images can become expensive but it seems like the images are likely unnecessarily big for an ebook, and that is why his costs are so disproportionately large.

1 - http://www.thepassivevoice.com/06/2012/amazons-markup-of-dig...

If you want a semi-realistic startup reality tv show to watch right now, try TechStars on Bloomberg Tv: http://www.bloomberg.com/video/75400336/ or Start-Up Junkies: http://www.hulu.com/start-up-junkies
Re:Notch's Specification for the In-Game DCPU-16 on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @11:36AM (#3798033)
That's my plan actually. It should be a lot easier to get going than C or an LLVM backend as others are suggesting.
Re:The perils of Lisp in production on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @11:31AM (#3798008)
I think you mean contracts or defensive coding. If someone calls my code wrong they will have to think to test that particular case themselves, which is hard. Unless I've written contracts; then when it blows up they'll know what they did wrong.
Re:How Not To Sort By Average Rating on Wednesday April 04, 2012 @01:16AM (#3796289)
Huh. You're right. That seems pretty recent, or I didn't notice the switch-over. Thank goodness.
Re:Bulletproof your blog – survive the Hacker News effect on Sunday December 25, 2011 @09:16PM (#3392054)
I was a little disappointed that when he talked about Jekyll blogs, he didn't mention Octopress. The default theme looks pretty good, it has a decent set of plugins and the code display looks great. It was actually pretty easy to set up too.

http://octopress.org/ My blog using the default theme: http://www.trevoroakes.com

Re:Winner of 2011 Google AI Challenge Describes Released Code on Saturday December 24, 2011 @02:54PM (#3389529)
Yeah. In this competition collaboration was discouraged. That does keep politics/alliance building skills out of the equation at the cost of worse overall final products.
Re:Winner of 2011 Google AI Challenge Describes Released Code on Saturday December 24, 2011 @01:24AM (#3388363)
You didn't do too badly this time yourself. 11th place. Looking at what he did, do you see what you could do to improve your bot further?
Re:Winner of 2011 Google AI Challenge Describes Released Code on Saturday December 24, 2011 @12:50AM (#3388324)
I actually used this idea from the forums and your post to get 683rd place even though I started on it with 36 hours to go before the deadline. http://aichallenge.org/profile.php?user=972 So thanks.

How'd you do?

Re:Winner of 2011 Google AI Challenge Describes Released Code on Saturday December 24, 2011 @12:46AM (#3388317)
Haha. It didn't say that before, because he hadn't officially won yet. It's actually been propagated from Tron: http://a1k0n.net/2010/03/04/google-ai-postmortem.html
Re:The Fall 2011 Google AI Challenge (Ants) is over on Friday December 23, 2011 @09:18PM (#3387950)
Overall Winner's Code and description of how it works: http://xathis.com/posts/ai-challenge-2011-ants.html
Re:The Fall 2011 Google AI Challenge (Ants) is over on Friday December 23, 2011 @09:08PM (#3387930)
Re:The Fall 2011 Google AI Challenge (Ants) is over on Friday December 23, 2011 @09:06PM (#3387926)
16th place's description of how their code works: http://www.decompilinglife.com/

and profile: http://aichallenge.org/profile.php?user=4728

Re:The Fall 2011 Google AI Challenge (Ants) is over on Friday December 23, 2011 @09:03PM (#3387920)
11th place's code: https://github.com/a1k0n/ants/tree/master/bot

and profile so you can watch how it works in action: http://aichallenge.org/profile.php?user=432

Re:The Fall 2011 Google AI Challenge (Ants) is over on Friday December 23, 2011 @09:01PM (#3387915)
Here are some histograms from before the finals of how different languages and countries did compared to each other: http://imgur.com/a/Li1b4
Re:All Programmers Are Self-Taught on Wednesday December 21, 2011 @01:26PM (#3378489)
This essay seems quite relevant: http://www.lambdassociates.org/blog/hackers.htm

It compares self-taught and college taught programmers to street fighters and martial artists.

Re:Scala Feels like EJB 2 on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @06:08PM (#3267871)
I think you mean:

; println(myList)

i.e. reorder those and add a semicolon or put it on the next line

and I agree with pivo that "Jim" :: "Bob" :: Nil should be List("Jim", "Bob"). I'm not sure if these are the same as _Y_'s Fantom code, but both of these print out "List(Jim, Bob)" in Scala.

Re:Scala Feels like EJB 2 on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @05:57PM (#3267823)
Cons is short for construct and comes from Lisp which has weird names for things; things like car and cdr.

It means construct a new list.

A cons A (or A :: B) means create a new list with A before B, where B can be a list item or a list itself and A is a list item.

The :: operator is right associative so "Jim" :: "Bob" :: Nil actually works like ("Jim" :: ("Bob" :: Nil) ) (Actually all operators that end in : are right associative in Scala.)

For more see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cons

Re:Perlis Languages on Sunday August 14, 2011 @05:22PM (#2884486)
I spent quite a few hours a while ago trying to organize languages into different language groups in order to pick which languages to learn next. If you're interested in that see the blog post that came out of that: http://hacklash.posterous.com/how-to-choose-your-next-progra... .

Just be warned that I'm coming at it from the outside with most of these languages, to make your final decision try and find someone experienced in multiple languages from the paradigm and ask them which to learn the paradigm with.

Older »