top_sigrid

PHP core maintainers themselves have said that only upgrading PHP will be sufficient: https://phpc.social/@Girgias/117476477429221001

PHP core maintainers themselves have said that only upgrading PHP will be sufficient: https://phpc.social/@Girgias/117476477429221001

> Elon is brilliant when it comes to hardware.

What shall that even mean?

I wouldn’t be too sure about that

And BYD doesn't have propietary software? Also this leaves out Kia and Hyundai, the latter which I would argue has some of the best EVs and in Europe with the Inster also one of the most affordable ones without it being stripped down completely.

Is this related in any way to the post or just spam?

Yes and like I said, nothing about this is proof that they are close to actual unsupervised driving.

Yes and nothing points to them having solved unsupervised driving. Which you seem to conclude from publicity stunts.

Yes, privy influencers. And it was supervised from the car behind it. No one else was able to find such a ride. Tesla cars also autonomously self-delivered. Which also turned out to be a one-off publicity stunt. Up until now, nothing points to that this is something different this time.

This is so dumb, I don't even know if you are serious. Nobody ever said it is lidar instead of cameras, but as additional sensor to cameras. And everybody seems to agree that that is valuable sensor-information (except Tesla).

> If you can train a policy that drives well on cameras, you can get self-driving. If you can't, you're fucked, and no amount of extra sensors will save you.

Source: trust me, bro? This statement has no factual basis. Calling the most common approach of all other self-driving developers except Tesla a wank also is no argument but hate only.

There is no evidence of unsupervised robotaxis actually rolling out. These are just the same promises Elon has wrongfully done since literally 10 years and some publicity stunts.

See also

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46777652

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46773561

Do you have ANY datapoints or arguments to underpin that renewables "destroy all wilderness". Or even more that they are worse than fossil fuels? This claim - especially in your harsh tone - could need at least some reason.

Can you elaborate what exactly you mean by that and what you encountered?

Is there actually anything known to his wellbeing?

Thanks for these insights! Do you have any material or sources for a layman to learn more about this and where these numbers come from?

See also:

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46304379

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46305216

Like Alan Kay himself said, it wasn't about objects, but about messaging. [0]

[0] https://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/1998...

Literally the first sentence: More than half of the European Union’s (EU) electricity came from renewables in the second quarter of 2025, and solar is leading from the front.

Are there also already analyses of these die shots, explaining what be concluded from them?

Oh and in the past people had diseases whithout a vaccine and sometimes got immunity (and didn't straight up die), hence vaccines are not needed? The logic in this comment is poor.