tomsun

I like the spirit of the ideas, but yeah I gotta say it's a little extreme to me.

Forcing people to spend money in their life time is going to incentivize consumerism. So I was super rich, and you want me to be forced to spend rather than invest and pass down to the next generation, I'm either going to try to pass it down illegally, or spend on things like sports cars and yachts and watches and fine wines and michelin star restaurants. None of them is as valuable as keeping it invested. On top of that, I'd divest all my holdings (which, if I didn't diversify well, means asset value in general will drop whenever someone super rich dies, which also opens up the opportunity for speculation, but that's beside the point).

This also doesn't take in the account of sudden death. What if you suddenly died at 45, with a $1.5 million estate? So you never had the opportunity to enjoy it. This will incentivize people to be a lot more near-sighted and again reinforces consumerism.

You mentioned having it being taxed at 90%. I'd say that's probably good, but I'd go a step to the right and say 90% on anything that's over $2mil, since your argument is contingent on a very very strong social safety net, which I do not think the United States has, and I would say it's also debatable on how strong you want the social safety net to be.

Just my two cents.

I think the point of the Latte factor, isn't that you shouldn't buy expensive coffee drink. The bigger problem is mindless spending racks up the expense column without adding much value.

Once you get into the habit of getting a coffee from an artisan coffee shop everyday, the value of that great cup of coffee diminishes, and you start to spend money out of habit, not because it adds any more joy, pleasure, or value to you. This is the same as eating out everyday for lunch.

And if mindless consumption seeps into every other aspect of your life, then that's going to cost you dearly.

I think if you can get a decent tech job and if you speak French. Montreal is definitely a better pick than Toronto.

I think of it like mechanical art pieces. A blend of mechanical engineering, art, and craftmanship. Plus if it's made out of precious metal it's a hedge against inflation.

And like art, it has a robust secondary market, which means some of the rare ones can go up in value, sometimes by a lot. People don't buy art because they get something, they buy art because they simply appreciate it.

Everybody is different. I'd pick a thousand dollar watch over a MTG collection or a gaming tower any day (mostly because I don't think gaming is valuable at all)

Windows and OSX are products, and Linux is more like a free commodity. It's great to use it at scale because you save a shit ton of money on licensing fees, but not great for end users. Getting end users to use Linux is like asking drivers to buy barrels of crude and tell them to refine it to use gas.

Graduated 2 years ago and been working as a QA. Looking for QA automation and Junior front-end engineering.

Location: Toronto, ON.

Remote: No preference

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: JS/HMTL/CSS, Python, R, SQL

Resume: http://tomsun100.github.io/Personal_Website/curriculumvitae....

Email: [email protected]

From a business perspective, they can convert and retain a lot more users if they actually try to dampen the racism on the website.

I don't know what I'm more sad about in this article, the fact that so much economic activity is dedicated to boast oneself's social status by paying to gain proximity to celebrities, or that these parties are insidious to a celebrity's mental and physical health.

Soooo, facebook is trying to be slack?

Wow. To call this article a fluff piece is an insult to fluff pieces.

I think a good way is to split your emergency fund with cash and credit. Sock 3 months of cash and get low interest LOC to cover whatever else comes up. That way you don't get opportunity cost of saving all your money into a low interest account.

I'm Asian too. I don't think it's because of raw intelligence. Asians work hard, but in a very confined way, and visible way. For example in high school, you work hard in school to get into a great college, your hard work is visible.

Scientific discovery and technological innovation takes more than hard work, it takes the willingness to be obsessed with specific and sometimes obscure fields and forfeit social prestige and stability. Neither of those things are praised by the Asian culture.

I had an interview with Salesforce as a new grad and they spent one round asking basic algo questions, one hour long phone screening asking specifics of Java, Python, C++, Javascript, one onsite whiteboard round designing tests with an in house framework for an in house product. And another round traversing trees and graphs. I didn't make it to the next two rounds, but man these engineering interviews are intense.

Waterloo represents. :)

Also a lot of the take home interviews are time limited. So you would only have a certain amount of time to implement a solution.

>"Synergy, You know what that means?" >"Does it mean take a stack of cash and light it on fire?"

This makes perfect sense. The reason why debt/fixed income products were stable in the past is because of the lack of liquidity. But now with the advent of structured product and ETFs, a lot of bonds are behaving more like publicly traded equity and being speculated upon, thus increasing their volatility.

I don't think a lot of people will get offended if you address a group as guys. But if you address a group of girls as "girls", or even "gals", you are walking a fine line.

>Nassim Taleb summed this up for me: “3,000 years ago people were doing math on tablets. Now…people are doing math on tablets.”

>If something withstands the test of time, use it. Every leader learns from the past. Every leader uses the past as his filter to figure out what will succeed in the future.

I don't know if I can come up with a worse quote to prove that point even if I tried.

So the writer didn't like it because it's too geeky? She's too cool for tech gadget.

The author of this piece is self-rightous. But the bigger problem isn't his inability or his relent to honor the student loan debt. The bigger problem is the detachment of the value of education, and prospective students' understanding of which.

When students enter university, they understand that it is a place that will challenge their intellects, but what they don't understand is the amount of financial value it will provide after they graduate. Unless they go into a lucrative field, the return on investment in liberal arts (not picking on this specific major) is not worth it.

Unless you're going into a top program in a top university (Engineering at Ivy League, CS at Stanford, MIT, CalTech, etc), it's better to enroll into an STEM program at a reputable in-state college. Otherwise it's almost not worth it.

I'm assuming the government gets the interest payments in this case. Or else this "loan" is really just a subsidy for the banks.

Uber usually utilizes the phone GPS which the driver always puts on the dashboard. Makes it a lot harder to trick the riders.

"On Writing" is the only Stephen King book I've read. Definitely left a huge impact on my perception on fiction writing.

Well, you're basically asking more than a billion people to change their cultural value on a fundamental level that has been instilled starting 5000 years ago. I wouldn't casually put it aside as a minor issue that can be solved by social security.

As someone who spent more than half of his life in China, I'd have to agree with you, at least from an anecdotal perspective. Trust is hard to build in China. A lot of people care about making money but people scarcely think about creating value for the society. Wealth is synonymous with consumption. The worst part I think, is the 1) social stability is valued over social mobility 2) individuality is shunned rather than celebrated.

In America people are encouraged to pursue your desire, the mentality of "not giving a fuck" and do what you love is admired and regarded as a sign of courage. In China someone who questions the conventions is deemed as social outcast. People in China are more concerned with the appearance (having face) than trying to be innately satisfied.

Things may have changed over the last decade. But I think China still faces this tremendous cultural problem, despite the development growth.

Have a failing business? Not to worry. Just lobby for legislatures that can render your business relevant. Problem solved.