toddm
cut -d " " -f1-2,4-5 file.txt
where file.txt is: one two three four five
and the return is: one two four fiveI wrote 6 on my way to my Ph.D. in the late 1990s, and there was plenty of prior art at that time.
Here's one of mine, see references therein as well: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-abstract/110/7/3326/475...
Except, of course, Silicon Valley, which was before his time but fully predicted in his music as early as 1978.
I can only hope Altman and his ilk are footnotes to history as much as FZ remains a headline.
I don't know much about the security issues others have raised, but if you're good enough to make this thing then I deserve to be pwned by you.
Chapeau!
LEaP supports the mol2 format as illustrated in the OP's link, which is substantially better than the PDB format; but again, this thread has nothing to do with file formats and everything to do with the functionality of LEaP.
Finally, it's "deprecated," not "depreciated."
Note that LEaP is one part of the AmberTools suite of programs and is used to prepare systems for subsequent molecular dynamics simulations.
- Long-time AMBER disciple/user
Simulating Railroads with OpenUSD
I am not associated with the CLO other than as a supporter; they do great work and birders come in as many varieties as birds, including me. The flow of data to organizations such as the CLO is critical and these glasses might help augment that.
The data gathering aspect and mapping bird migratory patterns, populations, and other information from AI-enabled field glasses (as well as the apps and other, as there is image recognition in the aforementioned apps and probably many more I'm not aware of) would be quite helpful for a better understanding of how environmental change affects animal populations.
While I am not acquainted with him personally, I did my doctoral work at UT Austin the the 1990's and had the privilege of working with the resources (Cray Y-MP, IBM SP/2 Winterhawk, and mostly on Lonestar, a host name which pointed to a Cray T3E at the time) maintained by TACC (one of my Ph.D. committee members is still on staff!) to complete my work (TACC was called HPCC and/or CHPC if I recall the acronyms correctly).
Back then, it was incumbent on the programmer to parallelize their code (in my case, using MPI on the Cray T3E in the UNICOS environment) and have some understanding of the hardware, if only because the field was still emergent and problems were solved by reading the gray Cray ring-binder and whichever copies of Gropp et al. we had on-hand. That and having a very knowledgeable contact as mentioned above :) of course helped...
All of that depends on your training and experience. I am not particularly strong in the organic department; however, I am quite expert in areas of physical, aqueous, and computational chemistry. I'm also a geochemist, and have significant lab experience in mostly analytical chemistry. Needless to say, I'm a decent programmer, know a bunch of lab stuff, am quote proficient in linear algebra, and so on. Those main and ancillary skills together give me a pretty good idea of what's going on without having to consult any references.
Resources that I use daily: PubChem, ACS journals, my textbooks, visualization tools, and some software if I'm targeting a certain outcome. IUPAC for naming organics (rarely for me).
Also, I answer questions on the Chemistry Stack Exchange site (not so much these days) which requires a decent amount of digging in order to answer coherently.
Thinly-disguised clickbait/advertising.
Reminds me of being pamphleted in the airport in the early 1990s.
alias ks='ls'The no-throwing up rule was instituted some time ago because passers-by (mostly long-haul truckers at the time) would essentially dine for free irrespective of whether or not they completed the challenge. You are also on the hook for the $72, which was not the case back in the day.
See https://www.bigtexan.com/72-oz-steak/ for current rules and regulations.
You could, like I was many years ago, be doing field work at Pantex as part of your Master's thesis.
The people in the Texas Panhandle and Amarillo in particular are, in my experience, just as nice and welcoming as anyone else - present OP excluded, of course.
I was in academia - the last one, post-academia - and it was (to me) understood that having peer review was at least a gatekeeper for releasing information that might be useful to or otherwise heeded by the public. Maybe.
Are there problems with that? Are the prices exceptionally high, especially for academic libraries (I recall that Tetrahedron Letters was on the order of $25K in 1995 for a subscription at UT-Austin)? Yes.
But I keep coming back to the standards involved with friendly, neutral, or hostile people vetting your work. It's a higher standard to reach than the free market will entertain, but there is a cost. Keep you on your toes.
The staff and editors need to be paid. Reprints - something from my generation, actual hard copies, some of those requiring color and not BW - cost money. It all costs money.
Do the authors get something in return? Yes. We get refereed journal article citations on our CVs, and that's invaluable.
Love the idea, wish there was a meeting in the middle.
The benefit of doing so is that I have to keep myself in check and really think before I write - yes, there are edits and deletions - and overall the effect has been very positive for me.
Being active on the chemistry SE site has actually proven to be of value in getting jobs related to chemistry - at least 3 employers have said it was useful to see some of my answers - so that is also good.
On the negative side? As far as I know, there is only one other person on the planet who shares my first and last name combination (different middle initial, and turns out to be a distant relative) so there might come a day when I have to do some reputation control should someone impersonate me: but that's not something with a lot of upside :)