tnegoshi
I looked into the course a bit more though and one of the first lectures addresses this preconception people seem to go into the course with in what the professor calls the "GI Joe Fallacy." She refers to it as "this mistaken idea that knowing is half the battle."
There will undoubtedly be behavioral practices or studies in positive psychology you may have come across before, but there is a difference in knowing those things vs. putting them to use through conscious, habitual effort.
I can't speak to how good the course is on that type of learned discipline, but it might be worth another go if you were interested enough to read the article.
mistake > punish himself > donate to charity to punish himself
Donating to charity as a method to achieve the punishment goal is precisely material in this case.
GP is asking if this method, which contains both a gain and loss, actually results in a punishment with an intended loss.
https://www.policeapp.com/Entry-Level-Tenafly-NJ-Police-Offi...
> Department: Tenafly Police Department
> Type: Entry Level
> Job Title: Entry Level Police Officer
> Salary: $44,500-$125,000
> Location: Tenafly, NJ
For this standard it would have to apply to every driver. Should drivers who do not google "Tesla autopilot", let alone ones that do and read on in a section about said autopilot feature, be punished with death in a two ton metal trap?