throwawayg99
Re:Facebook vulnerability 2013
on Sunday August 18, 2013 @12:26AM (#6231641)
I submitted a bug to Facebook's whitehat disclosure 3 or 4 months ago. Got no response whatsoever, except an automated response. The bug still exists. The bug allows users to post as though they are other users on the timeline. I think that is pretty serious, but I guess they do not.
Re:Show HN: TextBlob, Natural language processing made simple in Python
on Saturday August 10, 2013 @08:49PM (#6193262)
This is awesome. I looked, but couldn't find out: is there a word sense disambiguation layer somewhere hidden in here?
Re:Some killjoys have removed the blink tag from Firefox
on Friday August 09, 2013 @12:42PM (#6186665)
You forgot marquee!
Re:Why You Don't A/B Test, and How You Can Start This August
on Monday August 05, 2013 @03:27PM (#6162321)
Why are you suggesting A/B instead of multi armed bandit approaches?
Re:Why You Don't A/B Test, and How You Can Start This August
on Monday August 05, 2013 @03:26PM (#6162319)
You're right. That's a bit more reasonable, so back to my 10% change in base rate (1% abs.) but with a 90% power:
> power.prop.test(p1=0.1, p2=0.11, power=0.9,sig.level=0.05)
Two-sample comparison of proportions power calculation
n = 19746.62
p1 = 0.1
p2 = 0.11
sig.level = 0.05
power = 0.9
alternative = two.sided
NOTE: n is number in *each* group
Requires about 40,000 samples per test. I would strongly recommend anyone serious about doing this look in to MAB testing, as A-B testing is way too expensive for reasonable scale testing (unless you have a strong a priori hypothesis to test).
Re:Why You Don't A/B Test, and How You Can Start This August
on Monday August 05, 2013 @03:17PM (#6162254)
Nor me, to collect a 1% change:
> power.prop.test(p1=0.1, p2=0.11, power=0.8,sig.level=0.05)
Two-sample comparison of proportions power calculation
n = 14750.79
p1 = 0.1
p2 = 0.11
sig.level = 0.05
power = 0.8
alternative = two.sided
NOTE: n is number in *each* group
Edit: so that's 30,000 samples. To do the same with a 5% change in the same area is still 1300 samples (alpha=0.8, p=0.05)
Re:How 'One Weird Trick' Conquered The Internet
on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @08:32PM (#6137838)
I work with a dozen or so people who are involved in this sort of work. I think it is very interesting to see how they rationalize and deal with their moral compass internally.
One of the guys is the most caring, liberal, loving person you'd ever meet; he justifies being involved in this sort of skeezy marketing work as "I can take a small amount from a lot of people and amplify the result to do good with a lot of money."
He genuinely believes this. A lot of the other guys simply try not to see the "punters" (potential customers [1]) as real people, they are disconnected through the impersonal nature of the internet.
[1] http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/punter_2