throw_throw
Re:Microsoft Surface Laptops and Tablets Not Recommended by Consumer R...
on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:20PM (#14986358)
Quite a contrast:
https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/4/15961740/best-laptop-micro...
Re:Microsoft Surface Laptops and Tablets Not Recommended by Consumer R...
on Thursday August 10, 2017 @11:20PM (#14986357)
The ACCC handles complaints on behalf of consumers, and is more than happy to fine or litigate [1]. Most companies comply well before this stage.
1: https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-takes-action-agai...
Avast welcomes Piriform, creator of CCleaner, to its team
Re:A media company in Mumbai is giving women a day off during their pe...
on Tuesday July 11, 2017 @09:19PM (#14749444)
I think that's mostly a myth.
Re:52 Ways to Make Money on Instagram
on Monday June 12, 2017 @05:27AM (#14536001)
I can't flag, but this is low quality, borderline spam.
Re:Intelligent Tracking Prevention
on Thursday June 08, 2017 @04:21AM (#14512738)
Apple is quite good are targeting the lowest common denominator; most people do not know about these settings.
Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to sign up for a Google account without Gmai...
on Monday June 05, 2017 @08:41PM (#14493760)
Haven't been able to replicate this.
Re:Ask HN: Is it possible to sign up for a Google account without Gmai...
on Monday June 05, 2017 @01:01AM (#14485343)
Clicking Next Step then asks you to enter a phone number to either receive a call or text message for verification.
Ask HN: Is it possible to sign up for a Google account without Gmail and phone?
Normally you can sign up for a Google account using your own (non-Gmail email address) here:https://accounts.google.com/SignUpWithoutGmail?hl=enBut of late, the reCAPTCHA has been replaced with a phone number requirement.Is there no way to remain anonymous with Google now?
Re:Arabic, more accessible than you think
on Sunday June 04, 2017 @06:27PM (#14483989)
Re:Emacs is sexy
on Wednesday May 10, 2017 @11:16PM (#14313617)
Are you implying only females can be sexy?
Re:Spammers using CSS to bypass image blocks
on Saturday May 06, 2017 @01:09AM (#14278786)
Yes still got marked as SPAM.
But I was just surprised to see an image there. It's clever.
Re:Spammers using CSS to bypass image blocks
on Saturday May 06, 2017 @12:53AM (#14278733)
That image is made up of a 50 row table, with each row containing a single 100px wide and 2px high cell.
Each cell has 50 "pixels" set using CSS gradients.
