News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

throw1290381290

Re:Everything Wrong with MCP on Sunday April 13, 2025 @10:31PM (#43677556)
> Someone don't know that stdio is secure

I'm sure someone in the comments will say that inter-process communication requires auth (-‸ლ.

Re:Everything Wrong with MCP on Sunday April 13, 2025 @10:25PM (#43677533)
Here's the kicker. It is an API.
Re:Everything Wrong with MCP on Sunday April 13, 2025 @10:22PM (#43677510)
There are 2 transports, HTTP and STDIO.

You can use whatever authN/authZ you want for the HTTP transport. It's entirely up to the client and server implementers.

Re:Everything Wrong with MCP on Sunday April 13, 2025 @10:15PM (#43677476)
MCP can use HTTP or STDIO as transports.

There is no need to implement a new form of authentication that's specific to the protocol because you already have a myriad of options available with HTTP.

Any form of auth used to secure a web service can be used with MCP. It's no different than adding authN to a REST API.

Please just read the spec. It just builds on top of JSON-RPC, there's nothing special or inherently new about this protocol.

https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-03-26

There are way too many commentators like yourself that have no idea what they are talking about because they couldn't be bothered to RTFM.