News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

thibautdavoult

thanks, that mostly answers my questions as well but if you want to address them too, feel free :)
what is the specifics of the job you have (front end, back end, etc)? What languages do you use? How long/intense was the bootcamp? If you could talk about your salary that would be great but of course I'd totally get it if you chose not to answer this one.
Re:Is the Kickstarter bubble bursting for celebrities? on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @11:34AM (#6290610)
When they have to defend the very values and purpose of their company, I think it show something's wrong yes.
Re:Is the Kickstarter bubble bursting for celebrities? on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @11:32AM (#6290596)
Maybe it's a language thing on my part, but for me "my follow up" means "my next project after", which doesn't imply any continuation when it comes to the movies' contents. (It's possible I got that wrong but at least you know where I'm coming from)
Re:Is the Kickstarter bubble bursting for celebrities? on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @11:04AM (#6290425)
That's a fair point on VM's loyal fanbase that was lingering since 2007. But Braff's project leveraged Garden State as much as Lee's Leveraged Malcolm X and others of his past films. Your argument is biting its own tail: You're saying Lee's project was entirely driven by his name, but that's because Lee made it so. He could have made a more convincing video or written a better text giving more info (just like Braff did) but he didn't. My point is that he could have been more successful if he had put in more effort.

That's the whole point: Spike Lee's past films should outweigh Braff's effort with Garden State when it comes to convincing people about their respective ability to make good films, but it didn't.

Re:Is the Kickstarter bubble bursting for celebrities? on Wednesday August 28, 2013 @10:42AM (#6290278)
These are two excellent points you're raising here. About the 1st one: My intent with the sentence wasn't just to focus on the added revenue these projects provide, but also on the increased visibility they give to Kickstarter as a whole, which very much carries a long term impact for Kickstarter (SEO benefits, better brand awareness, etc). But I see what you mean: If these projects were truly hurting Kickstarter as a platform for everyone, they probably would have figured a way to make them stop.

Which brings me to your second point. It's true that the celebrity status is extremely tough to define and even tougher to measure in order to apply fair rules for everyone. But if there's a need for it, that is: if the existence of some projects start being detrimental to others, then I trust Kickstarter will work on it, crunch some data to figure out a way to prevent that from happening while remaining fair to project creators. Maybe by blocking projects a-posteriori, as they already did in the past.

Re:A wild bottom-up approach to Instagram Analytics [sfw] on Friday November 09, 2012 @07:08AM (#4762403)
That's better!
Re:A mesmerizing bottom-up approach to Instagram analytics on Friday November 09, 2012 @06:26AM (#4762287)
Would you feel better if there was a "dudes" version?
A campaign that takes place on Instagram, or that makes extensive use of Instagram to gather content. ie: A photo contest on Instagram were participants tag their pictures with: #WhatTheHeckjcromartie to enter. (not limited to contests, but it's the most obvious example)