News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

tguinot

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @03:43PM (#43825247)
Renaming racial admission rules "affirmative action" does not get rid of the racial hierarchy built into these rules.

Whether the goal of those rules is to "inject diversity" or not does not change the racial hierarchy.

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @10:31AM (#43821928)
Replace "blatant" by "implied" and yeah.

There was no mention of any race being inferior to any other in these posts.

The court guessed that this was the man's true belief. Same with the student that got expelled from the US for implying he supports Hamas.

This is not whataboutism: the original comment I replied to was precisely about Brits being afraid of the US government on free speech.

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @09:35AM (#43821393)
https://www.francetvinfo.fr/societe/justice/l-essayiste-fran...

It's a fact, I'm afraid. Disclaimer: I don't even like the guy, he makes money off conspiracy theories about Jewish people. But it's a fact that he got sentenced to prison for saying a journalist is a fat lesbian.

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @06:35AM (#43819697)
The only institutions having racial rules are left wing institutions like universities and they're generally racial rules against asians and whites.

Which is exactly what Trump is ending with DEI ban.

Trump is actually the president that is making institutional racism illegal.

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @06:33AM (#43819681)
Sorry to disappoint you but people in Europe don't have as much free speech as in the US especially in the press.

In European countries like France or Switzerland you get sentenced to prison time for describing someone as "a fat lesbian".

Free Speech is much better in the US.

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @06:14AM (#43819554)
I've been reading hilarious comments about what Trump will do since 2016.

I remember the "gays will be in death camps" from reddit.

Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @06:01AM (#43819477)
On the top of my head I can cite the cases of Lee Dunn or Billy Thompson who didn't call for violence and these are not the only ones. Please learn about the UK.
Re:PhD Timeline on Monday April 28, 2025 @05:48AM (#43819404)
In the UK they put their own citizens in jail for a Facebook post which is an order of magnitude worse than revoking the visa of a foreigner who comes to your country to tell you what politics your country should adopt.

They also deny visitors visas of academics on the basis of political views.

The UK is objectively worse.

Numbers of H1B applicants per country are available. The equivalent for the UK and France is also available.

If you believe there's nearly as many people trying to get out than there is trying to get in, you will be surprised.

The difference (per capita) is a factor of at least 10x

You also have to ask yourself why so many europeans try to move to the US for a better life (especially talented ones) and why almost no american does it the other way around. (The number is ridiculously low in comparison)

People move east to west across the pond, because they want the life offered by the US economy.

Re:Resigning as Asahi Linux project lead on Thursday February 13, 2025 @11:20AM (#43037549)
No good deed goes unpunished.
The code is 2 files of 80 lines each and is very clear. There's no way any software developer needs 4 days to understand what it does.

Moreover Claude can explain the functions used very clearly (if you're too lazy to jump to definition in your editor)

LLMs are becoming actually useful to developers new to a language. Just as Google was 20 years ago.

I know excatly how bad the output they give is, because I ask for output that I can understand, debug and improve.

People misusing tools don't make tools useless or bad. Especially since LLMs designers never claimed the compressed information inside models is spotless or 100% accurate, or based on logical reasoning.

Any serious engineer with a modicum of knowledge about neural networks knows what can or can't be done with the output.

good to know, thanks
It's a knowledge base that can explain the knowledge it returns when you ask, how is that not useful in a professional environment for production code?

I mean if you assume all devs are script kiddies who simply copy paste what they find on google (or ChatGPT without asking for explanations) then yeah it's never gonna be useful in a prod setting.

Also you're very wrong to believe every technical need or combination of libraries has already been implemented in open source before.

I think I will, I don't have time to maintain additional software right for other people now but I'm definitely planning on open sourcing it when I get time
I did not use copilot or cursor. I used the Claude interface. I'm planning to setup a proper editor tool such as Cursor as I believe they got much better lately. Last time I tried was 2023 and it was kind of a pain in the butt.
I'm sorry but I don't understand how people say LLMs are simply "tab completion".

They allow me to do much more than that thanks to all the knowledge they contain.

For instance, yesterday I wanted to write a tool that transfers any large file that is still being appended to to multiple remote hosts, with a fast throughput.

By asking Claude for help I obtained exactly what I want in under two hours.

I'm no C/C++ expert yet I have now a functional program using libtorrent and libfuse.

By using libfuse my program creates a continuously growing list of virtual files (chunks of the big file).

A torrent is created to transfer the chunks to remote hosts.

Each chunk is added to the torrent as it appears on the file system thanks to the BEP46 mutable torrent feature in libtorrent.

On each receving host, the program rebuilds the large file by appending new chunks as soon as they are downloaded through the torrent.

Now I can transfer a 25GB file (and growing) to 15 hosts as it is being written too.

Before LLM this would have taken me at least four days as I did not know those libraries.

LLMs aren't just parrots or tab completers, they actually contain a lot of useful knowledge and they're very good at explaining it clearly.