systemdtrigger

Paul Graham is the same blogger who "realized" Microsoft is dead quite a while back. Genius.

While I understand where you're coming from- I'd look at it slightly differently- Microsoft has a huge cloud business where people access outlook using web. If MS can secure it, apple won't be that far behind. Then again I don't know if apple has ever cared for user security much...

Anyway, I didn't downvote...

Sourcegraph is the same company that hijacked the langserver.org domain to almost completely remove credit for the original author of language server protocol.

Not a good team to be on.

1tev. No. That's literally cancer over light.

I was wondering why one of the fastest upvoted articles on HN, ever, was on second page. Now i know, and of course. YC , like other tech firms want to keep their business interest in China come to fruition.

Surely they must account for too many anti-votes coming from a single region?

Except if you stepped out of the hn bubble you'll know MS has had something similar in works for a long time so no, Google can't win here

Half of that is Trump though.

By decade you mean 1000pages (OP mentions 100/yr)?

So the sense I'm making is- that most of thesr attacks need to be supervised and need you to be a target in particular?

One question- do these vulnerabilities , including spectre and meltdown only help in stealing information or can they also hijack your computer to do arbitrary things?

Tagging on with a similar query. I am on Windows 10. If I were to run Firefox in sandboxie, would be the attacker have to deal with an extra layer of security or does it offer no help?