sweaver

lmao

would love if you could elaborate your definition for open core (and success) as curious to hear an alternative perspective :-)

Hi everyone! I am Sam the CEO and Co-Founder of Plural. I’ve been in open source for over a decade. I spent 4 years at Red Hat before spending the next 6 years building products at MongoDB. Most recently I was the Head of Product at Unqork where we saw how difficult it was to create a deployment for our app stack and its related services. My Co-Founder Michael Guarino and I are building an open-source platform that simplifies deploying third-party applications on Kubernetes. Michael and I would love to answer any questions or hear any feedback you’ll have regarding our project. We'll do our best to reply to all of them below. Thanks!

How consistent have the results been? I used this in the past with some flakiness...

This: https://github.com/pluralsh/plural

For sure, there is power at the cost of agility!

I've seen cases where we started off as simply as possible with no k8's. We built the initial product really quickly using a ton of managed services. Whilst it was great to get us going, once we hit "growth" things just didn't scale. (1) The cost of cloud was getting astronomical for us (and growing with each new deployment) and (2) it was totally inflexible (whether that be wanting to deploy in a different cloud, or extend the platform's featureset) because we didn't own the underlying service.

We ended up porting everything to k8's. That was a long & arduous process but it gave us total flexibility at significant cost savings. The benefits were great, but not everyone has access to the engineers/skillset needed to be successful with k8's.

That's why we built Plural.sh – it takes the hard work out of k8's deployments. I've seen people go from zero to a full production deployment of a datastack on k8's in just 2 weeks. It deploys in your cloud, and you own the underlying infra and conf so you have total control of it. And because we believe in being open, you can eject your stack out of plural if you don't like it and keep everything running.

Great post, and hope all is well with you!

I would say I would -never- base a hiring decision on someone who was poor at answering a market sizing or logic question. However, I do like to see candidates with determination to try and answer, explore multiple possible answers, and remain cool during their reasoning. To me, it’s reflective of your working style and PM’s must remain calm, rational, constantly thinking of all possible options to solve a working challenge.