sunk1st

Maybe it's cheap compared to other European countries but that doesn't mean it's cheap. Electricity in Spain is expensive.

My impression from the article is that it took $20,000 to perform all 1,000 runs.

> So now we rejected the MAIL FROM command and accepted the incorrectly addressed RCPT TO.

Which is the incorrectly addressed RCPT TO and why is it so?

What does that mean? Smart?

Wouldn’t that be a regular pyramid? In what sense is it inverted?

Is it acceptable to use the imperative? That is, to say: “Now, invert the element”. Or should it always be, “take the inverse of …”?

I don’t see a list of the datasets that have gone missing. Is there a list?

Can this be done on Mac OS?

> Nobody ever wants to be in the middle of a line, then move down to the next line and continue writing in the next column from where you left off. No real-world program ever wants to do that.

Is this true?

That doesn’t matter. The claim being made by the grandparent post is that the legal system isn’t well-equipped to deal with scenarios like, “yes the digital signature is valid but it was improperly authorized.”

Time savings

What makes the one spacecraft safer than the other?

It’s true that a stream-oriented abstraction puts constraints on the communication channel that don’t exist for a datagram oriented protocol.

45 divided by three is 15 is double digit.

This appears to me similar to the attack against weak Fiat Shamir presented at RWC this year.

Perhaps we should consider relaying the signal through a third satellite.

In so many words, Shannon gave a proof showing that in general the sample rate of a digital sensor puts an upper bound on the frequency of any signal that sensor is able to detect.

Unlike the Nyquist-Shannon theory, compressed sensing is not generally applicable: it requires a sparse signal.

As with many other optimization techniques, it’s a trade off between soundness and completeness.

Why those things specifically?

I don’t think it was luck. I think some people are so in tune with their systems that investigating an anomaly like this is a frequent occurrence. This particular anomaly just happened to have an explosive ending.

It’s silly that they do that. I doubt it matters, though. In my experience, querying ChatGPT for factual information like that is a mistake. It isn’t reliably accurate enough.

I think GP is just asking if the author thinks it’s possible. I remember it was hard in the beginning to know - when I would get stuck - if I needed to keep banging my head against it or if I had hit a dead end.

I agree it’s very nice. I’d also like to know how it was done.

Also if you click two bytes that are in the same caption group one after another then it bugs out.

Yeah I think that’s why GP is saying it’s a poor choice of name.

The point being made is that the title makes it sound like an observation has occurred that hasn’t.

What’s the implication? Sorry. I can see it going either way.

Unrelated to the putty fork, I take it

How do we get ourselves back to a state in which society at large is able to discuss facts?

Thanks. Very sad situation. Hard to understand how those memos would be sealed away from use by the defense.