stumpyfr
Some people were already thinking about leveraging OCI registries to do that; I extended the idea with a notion of "workflow/loop" to structure the concept of Loop Engineering.
Everything is versioned and has dependencies.
A user can install, with a single command, the complete collection of skills and workflows their team uses, and it's versioned!
Glad to take a review and feedback; a first implementation started and is showing great result/usage.
Show HN: Pulsar, live dashboard of all your PR, Engineering Manager dashboard
https://pulsar.arkham-advisory.com
Created for my own usage, shared as an open-source and hosted version.When you need to manage multiple teams, across multiple repos and start to have >50 PR... this tool provides you a single view with everything you need to keep track and know "what's next"
Show HN: Pulsar, a browser-only GitHub PR monitor for engineering manager
https://pulsar.arkham-advisory.com
I built Pulsar to solve a daily annoyance: GitHub's PR view doesn't give you a clean at-a-glance picture of what needs attention across multiple repos.Pulsar is a lightweight dashboard that runs entirely in your browser. You paste in a GitHub PAT and it never leaves your machine, no backend, no accounts.It shows PRs grouped by status (needs attention, awaiting review, your PRs, drafts), with...
Mixing the new GitHub agent workflow and Jira MCP to accelerate PR review
Then decide between option1 or 2.
Option 1: Start by taking a "random IT integrator/service job" to keep your flat and food on the table, stop even thinking about building and "vibing" something. Just take a job, large "consulting" companies are easy to join as entry-level and will give you enough to survive, but far from your 10k dream.
Stabilise your finances, take time to refine your ideas and plan the next step without the stress to not knowing if you will be homeless or hungry next month.
Option 2: Play the local lottery and tomorrow, GOTO option 1
Task management is complicated and very different based on the person/context (Startup vs large org).
I know both universes well, and while reading your first page, I found "Only one task "in-progress" per user for focused productivity." -> I stopped here. As engineer and manager of engineers I don't have one task in mind, I have hundreds, found me a way to visualise and make sense of all that and you would have my interest, not looking for another toggle-like app.
Second feedback: sorry, but I have the same issue; design is key. Based on the home page and lack of screenshots, I am fairly confident that you are a developer and not a hybrid unicorn able to create complete professional software without some help on the design/UX front.
If a kid asks "how do I bake cookies for my family" and the AI proposes to add some cyanide into the mix... yeah we have an issue.
Only way to improve the situation is to have large impact/visibility.
Congrats, you skillset is awesome and super valuable!
Now, what are you proposing to really change the mindset of the world population around climate change and the fact we are running into the wall?
the other option is the current one, we do close to nothing and we wait. Not convinced about this strategy to prepare a better future for the planet and the next generations.
So virtually keeping the death rate low.
Other countries are testing only people already sick with a lot of symptoms (==hospitalized). If we were testing "everyone", dead rate would be lower in Italy,...,...
You should put more in the front the real values of your product (and maybe the limits too).