News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

ssiddharth

Pricing is $0.24/million input tokens which is ~6x compared to Jev. Clef-flash is at $0.09 which is way more competitive.
Re:When thinking goes sedentary on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:22AM (#49755702)
Fair point about the cost of questions getting cheaper. I've been asking a ton of really basic questions in domains I'm not remotely familiar with as it's much easier to get an answer without having to navigate blogspam.
Re:I Just Want to Search on Friday August 21, 2026 @02:38PM (#49392222)
I was 11 in 2000 which is why I said ‘as a teen in the 2000s’. :)
Re:Every Byte Matters on Wednesday June 03, 2026 @07:47AM (#48382753)
Slight tangent, but every ms, μs, and ns counts too. We've gotten awfully carefree with response times and wasted compute cycles.
Re:Google's Antigravity Bait and Switch on Thursday May 21, 2026 @03:11PM (#48227583)
I've become an Antigravity convert mainly because of the generous limits, especially on the Anthropic models. User since day 1.
Re:Agentic coding is burning me out on Friday May 01, 2026 @02:10AM (#47971719)
No worries, it just grated a bit to be called AI slop by the person you were responding to and I assumed you agreed with them too.
Re:Agentic coding is burning me out on Thursday April 30, 2026 @05:14PM (#47968304)
Which part of the post feels LLM written to you? Not snark, I’m genuinely curious.

I’ve recently started writing again, after well over a decade, so I’m not very up to date on how things are done and perceived. FWIW, I write these on Google Docs and then port them over to my site. Earlier posts had an AI disclaimer saying I used Google Docs which presumably uses AI for spellchecking and obvious grammar issues but it ticked people off so I’ve stopped adding those.

Re:Keep Android Open on Wednesday April 15, 2026 @09:38AM (#47778804)
Somewhere along the way, installing became side-loading and the rot started taking hold.

</boomer-rant>

Tell HN: GitHub might have been leaking your webhook secrets. Check your emails.

Got an email from Github a few minutes back asking me to rotate my webhook secrets, the relevant portions of it below.We're writing to let you know that between September 2025 and January 2026, webhook secrets for webhooks you are responsible for were inadvertently included in an HTTP header on webhook deliveries. This means that any system receiving webhook payloads during this window could...

( Read More... | 12 comments | 19 points | on HN )
Re:TanStack Start Now Support React Server Components on Tuesday April 14, 2026 @02:10AM (#47761854)
I've been a big fan of TanStack start and have a few small apps (<10k users) in production running on TSS.

The DX is smooth, the defaults are sane, and things generally makes sense if that makes sense. There are plenty of skills available so Claude Code and Codex know how to work with it too.

If you're maybe finding Next a bit bloated these days, I'd recommend giving this a try. Plus Tanner, the creator, responds to almost every mention on Twitter so it's easy to get eyeballs on issues that you might face. :)

Re:Protect Your Shed on Wednesday April 08, 2026 @02:52AM (#47686296)
Same here. I've been trying to get more into the physical world, with a tech angle, rather than just pure software. As you said, using my hands is what keeps me sane, makes the world seem a little more real, if that makes sense?
Re:I Won't Download Your App. The Web Version Is A-OK on Monday April 06, 2026 @11:05AM (#47661890)
I do mention cases where the browser model doesn't work, like accessing Lidar sensors. Just didn't want to bloat the post with too many examples. But I totally agree with you on this front: not everything can be done as a PWA.
Re:The 667MHz Machine on Sunday March 29, 2026 @09:27AM (#47562974)
Fair enough. I've read a bit too much LLM written non-tech posts these year that I'm a bit fatigued. I figured people would just want to know this upfront. Moved it to the bottom now.
Re:Never Buy A .online Domain on Thursday February 26, 2026 @02:44AM (#47163113)
The site is already back online after the post. You can check yourself. If I really did have malicious content on the site, this post would have had zero effect on the result.
Re:Never Buy A .online Domain on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @03:32PM (#47157438)
Oh wow, I didn’t even think of this use case. Could I please get in touch for a bit more info?
Re:Never Buy A .online Domain on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @01:56PM (#47156064)
Ha, thank you. I spent more time than I'm willing to admit to come up with it.

I use my older, much longer domain for email and identity (it used to be #3 on SERP for "Sid"). This one is just for giggles so I can blog in peace without affecting the main one.

Re:Never Buy A .online Domain on Wednesday February 25, 2026 @01:46PM (#47155901)
I can't be 100% sure but googling showed nothing. My site was up for almost 6 weeks with no issues. I used the domain for Apple's review process too. No issues at all.

Older »