snksnk
> "professional Sysadmin"
Perhaps relay the email out via your ISP account? I do that and it works well.
> Having email just down for a couple days while you wait for new hardware to would be a very bad experience.
Perhaps set up a fallback MX that directs traffic to e.g. a Mailfence account when your primary MX is down? Works for me. Also, mail servers can be cheap hardware (an old x220 will do).
Taken from my smtpd.conf:
table secrets { mylogin = [email]@ziggo.nl:[pass] }
accept tagged DKIM for any relay via tls+auth://[email protected]:587 auth <secrets>> I don't mind, of course, and was not expecting any kind of payment since that is not required. There isn't even any suggestion in the license that it would be appreciated.
> The only thing that would have been nice is that after the project had been finished and the chip deployed, that someone from Intel would have told me, just as a courtesy, that MINIX 3 was now probably the most widely used operating system in the world on x86 computers. That certainly wasn't required in any way, but I think it would have been polite to give me a heads up, that's all.
> If nothing else, this bit of news reaffirms my view that the Berkeley license provides the maximum amount of freedom to potential users. If they want to publicize what they have done, fine. By all means, do so. If there are good reasons not to release the modfied code, that's fine with me, too.
The share price is _not_ supposed to drop after an IPO. The insiders still have a lock-up of 6 months, so a lower price would be bad for them. Moreover, the investors in the IPO also want some upside. In the end, the IPO price is a negotiated price that takes into account a lot of considerations. Once public, the price is dictated by the last trade.
And "smalltime" investors shouldn't invest in IPOs because of the so-called winner's curse.
Then we got "Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say"
In summary, (i) the U.S. electricity grid was not penetrated, (ii) the malware can be purchased online by anyone.
The WaPo seems to be more concerned lately with pursuing a certain agenda instead of quality journalism. Another example is a recent article in which they give credibility and rely on an organisation called PropOrNot; this article even became "one of the most widely circulated political news articles on social media". [1]
And organisations such as the WaPo are supposed to shield us from fake news and "fact-check" Trump.
[1] For a good discussion, see: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/washington-post-disgrace...
Logical fallacies should be taught in school: we also start with simple arithmetic before we move to more complex topics. (A course in formal logic seems overkill, it should be an applied course.)
NewsBlur even has support for Twitter: http://blog.newsblur.com/post/145256277160/twitters-back-bab...
We do, don't be so condescending and expletive. The popular press just wants some cheap sound bites to get more views / clicks. They do the same with academic research, in which they mistake economic significance for statistical significance, ignore any shortcomings, ignore non-rejected hypotheses, and project the findings outside of the (often very limited) scope.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iigNHgUGjYA
Here are two lectures on this. Very interesting, although far beyond what I can grasp.
> http://www.his.com/~z/passage.html
As a side note, see these two links for some quotes and passages from Gibbon's magnum opus. The whole work (including footnotes) is amazing.
I have seen many web sites turn from a hobby into a small business funded by ads, who are now feeling the pinch. They either need to find a new way to monetize what they offer, or turn into a hobby project again. (Which often saves a lot of money on horrible UX. Generally after 2007 / the uptake of smartphones a lot of good features were eliminated and sucked into the black hole of UX and dumb simplifications to accommodate the average Internet user. Everything is tailored now for the average user, and the power user is left out.)
> Patch: http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.8/common/007_ob...
> Releases: http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/
I am glad that bugs are found. It shows that the audit is thorough, since bugs can still be expected in LibreSSL (still quite new) and OpenSMTPD (audit was explicitly requested).