slgt
Re:Firefox 55 and Selenium IDE
on Monday August 21, 2017 @12:02PM (#15065493)
This describes exactly my/our experience. Test recording can be a great time saver when used properly. Sure, a Java or Python guru can write a webdriver test in "seconds", but she usually does not want too. Plus the "seconds" often turn into hours of coding and debugging ;-)
Re:Firefox 55 and Selenium IDE
on Monday August 21, 2017 @11:42AM (#15065356)
I am evaluating E2E Test Builder and Kantu Selenium IDE Light, both are Chrome extensions and open-source.
Re:Firefox 55 and Selenium IDE
on Monday August 21, 2017 @05:03AM (#15063012)
In the last hours since submitting this link to HN, I started using the Selenium IDE made by Kantu:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/kantu-browser-auto...
It works well for what it does and covers basic recording/replay for the core commands. But it is a new project, and by no means a full replacement yet. Code on Github (GPL license).
Re:Firefox 55 and Selenium IDE
on Monday August 21, 2017 @04:57AM (#15062983)
Disagree 51%. Recording tests works well and saves tons of time in specific scenarios. It works especially well for "throw away" test cases that you need only for a few days, for example during development of a specific feature. So I consider your statement way too black and white.