slackito
slackito on Hacker News
Depending on which European country it's not necessarily forbidden. "Compliance reasons" may also mean "the company must pay overtime at the appropriate rate" and they just don't want to deal with that.
The fact that you're comparing CUDA to using triangles and shaders makes me think you might be confusing OpenCL with OpenGL.
OpenCL is meant for general computation (the C is for "computing") rather than graphics, like CUDA.
Posted by
slackito on Thursday March 19, 2020 @02:38AM
from the youtube.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Tuesday June 18, 2019 @09:21PM
from the positech.co.uk dept.
Thanks for the pointer to zopfli. I've used p7zip in the past as a "better gzip", and it gets good results for this one too :D
$ curl -s http://danlec.com/st4k | gzip -cd | 7z a -si -tgzip -mx=9 compressed.gz
$ wc compressed.gz
14 84 4048 compressed.gz
I did the same for C++. I hate many aspects of the language, and it feels really ugly compared to newer languages like C#, or even D, but it's still my language of choice for some projects (mostly because the tools are mature and almost everywhere).
The GPU doesn't execute Javascript. It runs small programs called "shaders", written in GLSL (the OpenGL shading language), which are compiled on the fly by the graphics driver to something that can be actually executed on the GPU.
Posted by
slackito on Friday December 07, 2012 @05:13AM
from the natsys-lab.blogspot.ru dept.
I think a valid, although not legal, motivation for that could be "I just want something Microsoft will activate because I want a clean (i.e.: without applying a random crack from the Internet which could install malware) Windows install, at the minimum possible cost".
I'm getting the same from 149.11.24.18 (home Internet connection, Spain) and te-4-4-gblx.sto1.se.portlane.net (from a US-based VPS).
Giving a browser plugin the ability to run any program on the user machine without any kind of validation or prompting is so stupid/evil that they deserve the worst PR backlash they can get.
Also, that's probably the quickest way to get them to release a fix.
In fact, the concept of "freestanding implementation" (as opposed to "hosted implementation", which is a implementation of the full standard) exists in C, and is sometimes used in embedded systems:
a conforming freestanding implementation is only required
to provide certain library facilities: those in <float.h>,
<limits.h>, <stdarg.h>, and <stddef.h>; since AMD1, also
those in <iso646.h>; since C99, also those in <stdbool.h>
and <stdint.h>; and since C11, also those in <stdalign.h>
and <stdnoreturn.h>
(source:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/gcc/Standards.html)
So yes, a conforming (freestanding) C implementation without printf for embedded systems can exist.
Six months of unemployment per year of employment? Where are these figures from?
For unjustified firing, the employer has to pay 33 days of salary for each worked year (was 45 before the recent labor law reform)[1]
Not even the unemployment subsidy, which is given by the social security and paid for workers with taxes on their monthly pay, is that big (4 months for the first year, and 2 months more every 6 additional months worked, with a limit of 24 months).
[1] http://www.eitb.com/en/news/detail/828511/austerity-measures...
Posted by
slackito on Thursday February 16, 2012 @04:59PM
from the youtube.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Tuesday November 29, 2011 @01:22PM
from the techblog.netflix.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @08:48AM
from the whywereason.wordpress.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Thursday August 25, 2011 @02:33AM
from the slackito.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @06:24AM
from the altdevblogaday.org dept.
Except for the "g++ >= 4.6" part, AFAIK.
Posted by
slackito on Thursday April 28, 2011 @01:28PM
from the iquilezles.org dept.
Posted by
slackito on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @08:49PM
from the slackito.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Tuesday March 01, 2011 @10:29AM
from the google.com dept.
Yes, in control flow hijacking exploits like these ones, you make a given process execute external code (typically a shellcode, i.e. a small piece of code which launches a shell). Any code executed this way runs with the UID of the original process, so a setuid root program is needed to get a root shell.
Posted by
slackito on Tuesday February 15, 2011 @10:56AM
from the altdevblogaday.org dept.
Posted by
slackito on Thursday February 10, 2011 @06:54AM
from the naughtydog.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Monday January 31, 2011 @04:40AM
from the altdevblogaday.com dept.
Posted by
slackito on Thursday December 23, 2010 @07:16AM
from the rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org dept.