shcheklein

just curious since it reminds me a bit. Have you / someone tried https://entire.io/ (I'm not affiliated at all, so it is not a plug).

If they have custromer feedback and focus groups like they mention how did it happen in the first place? Some overoptimistic head-of-something? Really curious. I own previous -2021 mb and had to drive the upgrade (touch buttons) once as a replacement car. UX is terrible. Period. I even checked then in the dealership what they did to S-class and mybachs - and yes, same crappy wheel, etc. Anyways, I was mostly surprised that they didn’t know this before. Something is wrong with their research / decision making.

Can it be also related to demand not catching up or even declining? If place is in high demand and prices go down shouldn't it cause even more people coming to it (compensating for a possible price change). (Note: not an expert on this, I'm just curious how it really works - besides obvious thing: more supply -> price goes down).

Seems to be a duplicate with this Show HN authors made: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46290617 . Let's please merge this if someone from the moderators team can do that. Thanks!

Yep, exactly, It takes time to close the gap so that more and more teams taking that tradeoff

Probably people at some point were making same arguments about ASM and C. How many people though do ASM these days? Not arguing that for now it is relevant point, obviously Rust / C are way faster.

What if its parents "motivation" to a large extent (and by gaming I meant primarily parents pushing extremely hard)? How would you draw the line?

To be clear - I personally don't have an answer to this.

This is probably the right solution. It seems in reality nobody does this since it is expensive (more teachers, real attention to students, etc). Also if there is an explicit split there will be groups of people who "game" it (spend disproportional amount of time to "train" their kids vs actual natural talent - not sure if this is good or bad).

So, it feels to me ideally within the same classroom there should be a natural way to work on your own pace at your own level. Is it possible? Have no idea - seems not, again primarily because it requires a completely different skillset and attention from teachers.

To be fair. I live at Mission Bay (SF) that has Caltrain railway nearby (and you have to cross it if you take particular ways in/out). I drive (and like it a lot!) Waymo. Waymo avoids crossing it (it takes a longer way to drive a bridge). So, they probably realized the risk and still to this are not willing taking it.

Congratulations on the launch! Amazing work, it would be great to see how it evolves into a bigger story, work related agents beyond healthcare.

On the other hand it might become a next level of abstraction.

Machine -> Asm -> C -> Python -> LLM (Human language)

It compiles human prompt into some intermediate code (in this case Python). Probably initial version of CPython was not perfect at all, and engineers were also terrified. If we are lucky this new "compiler" will be becoming better and better, more efficient. Never perfect, but people will be paying the same price they are already paying for not dealing directly with ASM.

Another alternative to consider is https://www.getdaft.io/ . AFAIU it is a more direct competitor to Spark (distributed mode).