News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

scriptsmith

Re:I paid people to try and follow my README on Sunday October 11, 2026 @08:27AM (#50042552)
Somewhat related question: what is it about READMEs that AI agents love to dump the most useless, hard to contextualise & comprehend, irrelevant rubbish into them that makes understanding a project and onboarding so hard?

It feels like like the AI agents can't help themselves sometimes, and the judgement exercised around what's included and omitted is baffling.

But maybe READMEs have always been this bad, and AI agents have raised the baseline?

Re: on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @06:28AM (#49990790)
This is from 2020?
Re:Claude Opus 5 on Saturday July 25, 2026 @01:18AM (#49044739)
It's a reference to this story where an OpenAI model broke out of its sandbox during cyber benchmarking and hacked into HuggingFace, in order to obtain test solutions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997548
Re:Text Art Tools on Sunday July 12, 2026 @03:44AM (#48879196)
I made these to create styled text art for the MOTD of my university's HPC login node:

https://github.com/ScriptSmith/tart

https://tart.sh/

Re:Kimi K2.7 Code is generally available in GitHub Copilot on Thursday July 02, 2026 @02:37AM (#48757384)
Is GitHub Copilot the best positioned platform for enterprise? They support Claude, GPT, Gemini, and now even open weight models. Larger orgs are paying at API rates anyway so it costs just as much as anywhere else. They have a pretty good agent CLI and SDK, and now a desktop app. They have hosted agents, and you can run their 'Agentic Workflows' in CI.

Has their reputation tanked so much that the alternatives get all the buzz? Or is it that non-enterprise users are priced out by the usage costs, so no free marketing?

Definitely took longer than I was expecting, then after two weeks I thought we'd never get it.
And now is this going to be a one-off, or routine with every new generation of models?
Re:Local AI needs to be the norm on Sunday May 10, 2026 @05:30PM (#48088283)
It's based on a Gemma 3n model, and yeah it's not the best. But if you have a use case that needs constrained JSON output for example, it's pretty neat.

Maybe it would do better with the new Gemma 4 models, which the Chrome devs have been hinting at moving to. And why the API doesn't let you introspect / pick the model, I'm still not sure.

Re:Local AI needs to be the norm on Sunday May 10, 2026 @05:22PM (#48088205)
I've got some demos of what the new Prompt API in Chrome that uses a local model can do: https://adsm.dev/posts/prompt-api/#what-could-you-build-with...

As OP says, it shines in constrained environments where the model is transforming user-owned data. Definitely less useful for anything more open-ended.

Chromium mostly does not support this, because it doesn't have the binary blob required to run the inference. However, it does still download the model weights and expose the LanguageModel API, because that part is hooked up.

https://adsm.dev/posts/prompt-api/#which-browsers-support-th...

Packagers might eventually disable that but I tested this behaviour in chromium 148 a few hours ago, and it would download the weights but has trouble running them.

Re:Google's Prompt API on Wednesday May 06, 2026 @07:23PM (#48043203)
> My understanding is that you’ll have to explicitly agree to download alternate models in the future, per the specification

I don't get that from the spec. Closest thing I could find in the Writing and Assistance APIs spec [1] (which the Prompt API refers to) says:

> [It] allows the user agent to prompt the user for permission

But that's talking more about initiating the 'download' process more than choosing the model.

I think Chrome wants the browser to be 'opinionated' about the model used however, rather than letting the webpage pick, at least for now.

[1] https://webmachinelearning.github.io/writing-assistance-apis...

Depends on where you get it. By default the flags will be enabled, but some packagers may choose to disable them. I haven't seen a major distro release chromium 148 yet.

Weirdly though, chromium won't be able to actually use the model even though it can download it, because the inference engine is a closed-source blob.

https://adsm.dev/posts/prompt-api/#which-browsers-support-th...

I wrote a more detailed blog post here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48028662

Chromium doesn't support this API because it needs a binary blob to run the inference, although in theory it may still be configured to download the weights:

https://adsm.dev/posts/prompt-api/#which-browsers-support-th...

It can only be called after the user has interacted with the page, but there's no dialogue from the browser

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/get-started#user-activa...

Re:The Prompt API is now on by default in Chrome on Tuesday May 05, 2026 @05:58PM (#48029212)
Author here. After trying out the Prompt API over the last week, I wrote up some details on the chromium internals, how to use the API, and made some toy demos.

It's a 4 GB model that can be used to run on-device inference.

In my understanding, yes. I wrote a blog post about some of the internals here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48028662
Google has been trialling the Prompt API in chrome for the over a year, so before Gemma 4 existed. But they are indicating they'll move to Gemma 4: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/iR6R7...
It's based on Gemma 3n, and it's not the best.

I find it works fine for simple classification, translation, interpretation of images & audio. It can write longer prose, but it's pretty bad.

It can also write text in the format of a JSON schema or regexp for anything you might want to do with structured data.

Those flags will exist already, but will default to enabled in 148.

That other flag is for using a different open-source inference engine to the (from what I can tell) closed-source one that's used by default.

If Chrome has the #optimization-guide-on-device-model and #prompt-api-for-gemini-nano flags enabled, either because it's part of some Origin Trial / Early Stable Release or something, then web pages will have access to the new Prompt API which allows any webpage to initiate the (one-time) download of the ~2.7 GiB CPU or ~4.0 GiB GPU model using LanguageModel.create()

https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/prompt-api

When Chrome 148 releases tomorrow, this will be the default behaviour on desktop.

To download, it should check for 22 GiB free disk space on the volume where your Chrome data dir is, and at least double the model size of free space in your tmp dir.

Re:No, it doesn't cost Anthropic $5k per Claude Code user on Tuesday March 10, 2026 @01:13AM (#47319297)
Yes, you could turn it around to say that using Anthropic models in Cursor, Copilot, Junie, etc. is 'subsidising' Claude Code users.
Re:Ki Editor - an editor that operates on the AST on Saturday March 07, 2026 @07:14AM (#47286943)
The "First-class syntactic selection" reminds me of my most used shortcut(s) in Jetbrains IDEs: the Expand / Shrink Selection.

  Ctrl + W
  Ctrl + Shift + W
https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/working-with-source-code...

It really changed my perspective on interacting with the 'text' of a file.

VS Code, Zed, etc. have similar operations, but in my experience they expand and shrink too coarsely.

Yes, I've used the v3.2 3B-Instruct model in a Slack app. Specifically using vLLM, with a template: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/examples/tool...

Works as expected if you provide a few system prompts with context.

Re: on Monday August 05, 2024 @01:00AM (#41158293)
To keep on-top of tabs in Firefox, I use 'Auto Tab Discard' [1] to discard tabs after a certain amount of inactivity. Then when I need to clean up my list of tabs, I click on any discarded tabs I want to keep, and then use my extension 'Close Discarded Tabs' [2] to clear the rest.

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/auto-tab-disc...

[2] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/close-discard...

Someone posted this in the thread, but I also can't log in to verify

> Summary

> CrowdStrike is aware of reports of crashes on Windows hosts related to the Falcon Sensor.

> Details

> Symptoms include hosts experiencing a bugcheck\blue screen error related to the Falcon Sensor.

> Current Action

> Our Engineering teams are actively working to resolve this issue and there is no need to open a support ticket.

> Status updates will be posted below as we have more information to share, including when the issue is resolved.

> Latest Updates

> 2024-07-19 05:30 AM UTC | Tech Alert Published.

> Support

> Find answers and contact Support with our Support Portal

It's crowdstrike: https://www.reddit.com/r/crowdstrike/comments/1e6vmkf/bsod_e...

> 7/18/24 10:20PT - Hello everyone - We have widespread reports of BSODs on windows hosts, occurring on multiple sensor versions. Investigating cause. TA will be published shortly. Pinned thread.

> SCOPE: EU-1, US-1, US-2 and US-GOV-1

> Edit 10:36PT - TA posted: https://supportportal.crowdstrike.com/s/article/Tech-Alert-W...

> Edit 11:27 PM PT:

> Workaround Steps:

> Boot Windows into Safe Mode or the Windows Recovery Environment

> Navigate to the C:\Windows\System32\drivers\CrowdStrike directory

> Locate the file matching “C-00000291*.sys”, and delete it.

> Boot the host normally.

Seems like he actually disagrees here:

If you train a bigger model on more text, we have a lot of confidence that the next-word prediction task will improve. So algorithmic progress is not necessary, it's a very nice bonus, but we can sort of get more powerful models for free, because we can just get a bigger computer, which we can say with some confidence we're going to get, and just train a bigger model for longer, and we are very confident we are going to get a better result.

https://youtu.be/zjkBMFhNj_g?t=1543 (23:43)

Older »