sapski
Facebook has been insisting that non-discrimination should be the responsibility of the purchasers, but we've shown over [0] and over [1] again [2] that even when the advertiser targets all groups proportionally (no misuse of advertising options), Facebook subselects who to show their ads to in a skewed way, leaving the advertiser and the users no recourse.
[0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.02095.pdf
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1912.04255.pdf
[2] https://sapiezynski.com/papers/sapiezynski2019algorithms.pdf
Facebook Ads Can Still Discriminate, Despite a Civil Rights Settlement
Facebook’s ad tools subsidize partisanship
Facebook's ad algorithm is race & gender stereotyping, new study suggests
Twitter bots and information contagion
The lib uses openstreetmaps as background, can display scatters, heatmaps, shapefiles, calculate and display voronoi tesselation, and does a ton of other things.
Everything is broken (2014)
You can control the scanning settings in settings -> WiFi -> advanced -> scanning always available. It's ON by default, but you can disable it there.
Apart from what you mention, what is new is the measurement of how many access point you actually need to know to track my location: it's costly to look up all the routers I see during a day, but we show that people spend a vast majority of the time close to a very small number of unique access points (~20 routers per person over 6 months).
2) ssids are not unique - when it says "airport" it can be any airport. When you have access to the mac of the device, you can pin point it uniquely - that's the threat we present.
3) with the threat you link, you theoretically might be able to recover some of the past locations of the user where they did connect to WiFi. With the threat we present you get the location history with time resolution of up to 20 seconds, whether the user connects to WiFi or not, and even if they disable WiFi, and you don't have to control any routers. I would say this constitutes a novelty.
=== EDIT ====
4) the link only mentions a theoretical possibility, we show that the threat is real based on real data collected over 6 months about multiple people.
I did however read through the privacy policies of the apps, and one of the top 20 with WiFi but not location permission mentioned collecting your location data.