News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

samr71

Re:AI 2027 on Thursday April 03, 2025 @05:39PM (#43575793)
It's not something you need to worry about.

If we get the Singularity, it's overwhelmingly likely Jesus will return concurrently.

Re:xAI has acquired X, xAI now valued at $80B on Saturday March 29, 2025 @12:59AM (#43512873)
They're gonna go public and the market cap will be at ~$300B within a year or two
Gary I respect you - will do!

Show HN: Love2d Game running in browser with a single-player eSports twist

https://fushigicorp.com/wtdtyaliny/

Hey HN! I'm a huge fan of Love2D - a lightweight, open-source, 2D game engine. It's easy to use, cross-platform, and perfect for hobby projects, but it doesn’t officially support web deployment. I've been working on a game in my spare time, and wanted to see if I could get it running in the browser without rewriting it in something like Godot or Phaser.After some trial and error, I hacked it...

( Read More... | no comments | on HN )
Re:AI Killed the Tech Interview. Now What? on Thursday February 20, 2025 @02:56PM (#43119350)
I have only a resume to convince them. I have job experience at major companies, with examples of what I've built when there, personal projects I've made, a github link, a great GPA from a good school.

And I know similar Junior-mid people in the same boat. We can all do Fizzbuzz, we've all built things, and somehow we're not getting interviews, but people that can't do Fizzbuzz are.

Do thousands of incompetents also machine-gun apply to, say, mechanical engineering, accounting, marketing, HR, or finance gigs? Is it just tech?

Something isn't adding up.

Garry Marcus constantly repeats the line that "deep learning has hit a wall!1!" - he was saying this pre-ChatGPT even! It's very easy to dunk on him for this.

That said, his willingness to push back against orthodoxy means he's occasionally right. Scaling really has seemed to plateau since GPT-3.5, Hallucinations are still a problem that are perhaps unsolvable under the current paradigm, LLMs do seem to have problems with things far outside their training data.

Basically, while listening to Gary Marcus, you will hear a lot of nonsense, it will probably give you a better picture of reality if you can sort the wheat from the chaff. Listening to only Sam Altman, or other AI Hypelords, you'll think the Singularity is right around the corner. Listen to Gary Marcus, you won't.

Sam Altman has been substantially more correct on average than Gary Marcus, but I believe Marcus is right that the Singularity narrative is bogus.

Re:AI Killed the Tech Interview. Now What? on Thursday February 20, 2025 @02:02PM (#43118690)
Do we have different definitions of "marginally qualified"? Idk, I feel I'm a decent engineer - I can certainly do whatever leetcode medium they throw at me, as much as this counts of anything - and can actually code, but I still get maybe 1 callback per 50 applications.

Does "marginally qualified" mean "Ivy League Competitive Programmer PhD" or something?

Re:AI Killed the Tech Interview. Now What? on Thursday February 20, 2025 @02:00PM (#43118666)
Yup. You can check out of FAANG anytime you like, but you can never leave.

Was path dependency for careers always this bad?

Re:AI Killed the Tech Interview. Now What? on Thursday February 20, 2025 @01:58PM (#43118646)
Use another AI, of course!

Idk if I'm even being sarcastic here.

Re:FAQ on Microsoft's topological qubit thing on Thursday February 20, 2025 @01:57PM (#43118632)
Other than fast factorization and linear search, is there anything that Quantum Computing can do? Those do seem important, but limited in scope - is this a solution in search of a problem?

I've heard it could get us very accurate high-detail physics simulations, which has potential, but don't know if that's legit or marketing BS.

Re:FAQ on Microsoft's topological qubit thing on Thursday February 20, 2025 @01:55PM (#43118603)
Wait so this tech just...doesn't work yet? Like at all?
I agree. The problem now seems to be agency and very long context (which is required for most problems in the real world).

Is that solvable? who knows?

Gary Marcus is cringe and wrong, but it's good to listen to folks who are cringe and wrong, because very occasionally, their willingness to be cringe means they're not wrong about something everyone thinks is true.
Re:Humane (Or Red Flags to Spot for Next Time) on Thursday February 20, 2025 @01:51PM (#43118547)
I still don't understand - what was HP paying $110M for??
Re:Obsidian is now free for work on Thursday February 20, 2025 @01:51PM (#43118539)
It's just a really really good markdown editor. With some great power user features. Not sure what else to say!
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users on Sunday January 19, 2025 @03:55PM (#42761719)
Time and effort does not a substantial point make.

The post was so shockingly hyperbolic I'm surprised they didn't mention the Chinese were also sapping and impurifying our precious bodily fluids.

What should I even say? It was a borderline schizo sinophobic diatribe asserted without evidence.

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users on Sunday January 19, 2025 @03:03PM (#42761171)
The American People

Source: US Presidential Election 2024 - Trump: 77,302,580, 312 EC - Harris: 75,017,613, 226 EC

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users on Sunday January 19, 2025 @02:58PM (#42761116)
They only have one option for the next two years: Impeach and remove. GOOD LUCK LMAO
Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users on Sunday January 19, 2025 @02:57PM (#42761091)
You consider them our major geopolitical enemies because the NYT and CNN told you they were.

"You are not immune to propaganda" as they say

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users on Sunday January 19, 2025 @02:52PM (#42761037)
But Instagram Reels is totally fine, ofc.

How much NASDAQ:META do you own btw?

Re:TikTok says it is restoring service for U.S. users on Sunday January 19, 2025 @02:47PM (#42760983)
I enjoy seeing HN independently rederive much of NRX thought via this situation.

In unrelated news, anyone see that NYT interview with Yarvin yesterday?

Re:What if no one misses TikTok? on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:24PM (#42751549)
The argument to ban TikTok is for trade reciprocity reasons. Reels and Youtube Shorts are banned there, so we should ban TikTok here. Just like how if Germany banned Fords and Chevys from being sold, we should similarly ban VWs and Audis.

That they say this is for "National Security" gives the game away.

Re:What if no one misses TikTok? on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:21PM (#42751520)
We don't think the Chinese government is any better. We trust neither government.
Re:What if no one misses TikTok? on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:17PM (#42751491)
Banning a media platform in America used by most Americans is controversial? Say it ain't so!
Do people not remember 2020-2021?
They will soon!

Lmao these people are rubes. It's like every other bs "national security" argument.

Expect Yandex, VK, RT, Sputnik, SCMP, etc. to be banned as well under similar pretenses.

"Comrades! We can not let these Western dogs infect our proud Soviet minds with this 'Radio Free Europe'!"

Re:Cannabis pollen dispersal across the United States on Thursday December 19, 2024 @06:16PM (#42466736)
For the love of Fuck, just legalize it, what are we doing here?

Worried it will be too much? Limit max THC % and max amount you can buy in a given span of time.

Thankfully, this is one of those issues that will just be GONE once the boomers die off, so this sort of idiocy won't be around too much longer.

Humans are not singular organisms, we're a colony species. We are evolved for (and thrive in) social groups. These social groups are not just voluntary associations, but are deeply rooted traditions - whether that's based in family, faith, or nation.

The problem with Modernity is that the systems and structures that humans have built to ensure continued human flourishing within these deeply rooted social bonds have grown far beyond their original scale. You can blame capitalism, the state, whatever, it doesn't really matter. What's important is that as the state or capital grow (and they have to, or be killed by others which do), they must necessarily tear down the old order; debride the old traditions which hinder its continued growth.

The end-state of this, which we can see best in places like East Asia, or California, is society in which humans are interchangeable chess pieces. People are atomized from any received community or tradition. Thus, reproduction is viewed not as a natural stage of life — an essential component in the ordered tradition in which they live their life — but as an object of luxury consumption. Very luxury! Which is why people in these regions tend to stick to one kid, maybe two (and if you walk around Seoul, you'll see plenty of dogs in strollers: much cheaper!)

In societies which haven't yet reached that end state, we see the same effect as the forces of Modernity inexorably creep in: religion wanes, tradition falters, birthrates fall. Be it Salt Lake or Suzhou, Tehran or Tokyo, we see this pattern in every place wherever Modernity is made manifest.

Re:The teen mental illness epidemic is international on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @11:34PM (#38936214)
So true. There's also the imminent return of Jesus Christ and the subsequent rapture to worry about. Kids have so much on their plate these days...
Re:The teen mental illness epidemic is international on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @11:27PM (#38936150)
I deny a drinking age is necessary. From what it sounds like, the kids should be out there drinking more!

Older »