samclearman
samclearman on Hacker News
Not sure what you mean by "should" here, but the IRS definitely considers it to be a gain that you have to pay taxes on, regardless of whether you can sell the shares.
RSU's are taxed on vesting, so it would be worse than options if anything.
Best are options with early exercise, but they're still not perfect (you have a possibly significant upfront cost to exercise them).
Really they should just change the AMT rules.
Yes, it's common. They'll say that it's because they don't want unapproved investors on their cap table, which I guess is reasonable, but obviously the main reason is "because they can".
Because the system is crazy, but it only affects early employees of successful startups so there's no political will to fix it.
In this case, the way it works is:
1. You exercise your options, for a paper gain of millions of dollars
2. However, you can't actually sell the shares (there are likely contractual restrictions on selling them, and even if not, there's not a liquid market)
3. So you have to pay millions of dollars of taxes even though your cash flow is zero.
And before you say "but they're ISOs", there's no such thing as ISO's under AMT so it doesn't help at all.
Posted by
samclearman on Tuesday October 11, 2022 @05:53PM
from the show-hn dept.
https://2etris.com/
Hey all! I actually made this years ago and never shared it because whenever I was about to, I'd always discover one little thing that I wanted to change.Anyway, it's a Tetris variant where one player's negative space is another's positive space. You'll need two people to play it. Please let me know if you find any bugs!
The article is about the 18th and 19th centuries.
I work at Scale - I've met a bunch of people that work on our platform, and seeing the impact that it's had on their lives is actually a huge source of inspiration to me. There's a writeup highlighting some of their stories at
https://scale.com/blog/positive-externalities - based on my personal experience, I can say that it's not bullshit.
Most Americans have spare bedrooms for when guests visit. You could have your guests stay at a hotel but typically that will be really far from your home which sucks for everybody. Having Sonder or Airbnb style short term rentals distributed throughout cities could allow people to live in smaller apartments, eliminating bedrooms that sit unused most nights creating more space for everybody.
To be clear I'm not talking about the model of renting out your spare bedroom on Airbnb because nobody actually wants to do that. I'm talking about full time airbnb studios / 1BR's obviating the need for guest bedrooms.
Pricing is per household, so a family of four spends the same as an single individual.
Maybe you never used to spend more than $10/month on video, but most Americans have been spending an order of magnitude more than that.
A la carte TV pricing was always a stupid idea. What people really wanted was cheaper pricing, which is of course not going to happen.
Top students getting offers in California are getting 150k USD minimum (including equity and bonus).
The other, probably more important, innovation was that you have to take the picture at the same time as you send it - no loading from the camera roll.
Yup and the solution is simple, a land value tax as close to 100% as is practical.
Probably because Firefox is a well known brand and Mozilla isn't.
Presumably the deal terms include a liquidation preference and thus the implied valuation is essentially horseshit.
This stuff is much worse than NSA data collection. Gag orders are evil, and secret courts are even worse. I really wish people would stop worrying about government surveillance - who cares what people know about you? - and start worrying about this instead.
No. All the data that they use is self-reported (when you sign up for health insurance, they ask you if you smoke, etc).
This article is utterly useless without comparisons to the equivalent numbers in other major economies.
This kind of thing is an advantage of Airbnb. Our litigious society has resulted in overly sanitized public spaces - no hotel would have a rope swing on a tree because of safety/liability concerns. We need to realize that it is not worth ruining everything to marginally improve safety.
Actually a bigger problem is that his advice is just straight up hard to follow. If correctly valuing public companies were easy, the market would be a lot less volatile.
... Since then interest rates went to zero and corporate profit as percent of GDP went to 10. I guess that's why he doesn't like to try to predict the market :)
Given that a US default would likely cause the collapse of the US financial system and possibly the entire world's financial system, it makes perfect sense to trust the US government's credit over that of any bank.
According to the article, and my own experience with google's version, it's good enough for simple portraits. Since most photos, and close to 100% of photos anybody actually cares about, are portraits that makes it a pretty useful feature.
If he has some justification for the formula to be as it is, why hasn't he shared it with us?
How does it make any sense to multiple the date by the sign of the score? It's true that it only matters when the score is negative, and so it doesn't really affect much in practice, but the code is clearly a typo.
No way to disable tabs (in particular the default "open in new tab" behavior) in Chrome.