saintfiends

Meilisearch is really good for a corpus that rarely changes from my experience so far. If the documents frequently change and you have a need to have those changes available in search results fairly quickly it ends up with pending tasks for hours.

I don't have a good solution for this use-case other than maybe just the good old RDBMS. I'm open for suggestions or anyway to tweak Meilisearch for documents that gets updated every few seconds. We have about 7 million documents that's about 5kb each. What kind of instance do I need to handle this.

Loki OSS is just a sales pitch for their managed service. It doesn't work well without dedicating significant time tweaking and configuring it. Documentation is confusing at best if you want to do anything serious. You have to also be ready to handle support calls if you open it up for others to use, because it WILL have issues fairly regularly if you have a good volume of logs and query range is more than a day or two.

Unless you have the bank to go with their managed service, don't bother.

What's the best option to buy a framework laptop outside of US. I tried shipping them to a parcel forwarder but they didn't also accept non-US debit cards.

sqlx [1] can definitely do this.

[1] https://docs.rs/sqlx/latest/sqlx/

Hey Yury, congratulations on the new release!

From what I'm seeing, the upgrade path is essentially dump and restore. This was the case for moving from EdgeDB v1 to v2 as well. Since EdgeDB is a fast moving target this creates a lot of friction for older databases to upgrade.

Is there plans for replication support or a more robust upgrade path?

I'm a long term vim user and now exclusively a neovim user. I adopted this from the first time I came across this. It's pretty neat, it does break from time to time but there's always a GitHub issue describing a workaround. It's pretty stable these days and breaks far less comparatively.

I've been using chezmoi too and this is the only feature I miss. It'd be interesting to know what solutions folks are using. Chezmoi has some discussions around it, mostly recommending to use run scripts.

We thought so too until we found out it doesn't support any kind of SSO

https://github.com/SigNoz/signoz/issues/1188

> Yes! Right now we only support OpenID Connect and OAuth1/OAuth2 delegation but more to come.

Does it support OAuth1 delegation. Could you point to the docs

How is event ordering handled when multiple instances of Jitsu are involved.

Interesting idea. I'm not sure how scalable this would be given the fragile nature of the tools.

I want to believe with enough indications of the monitoring itself (Is the screen being refreshed? Is network connected ? When was it last checked?) that this is a viable option and that would unlock a lot of possibilities.

But I can't shake off the feeling of uneasiness (What if it's not working and we don't know it's not working)

PS: I'm not bashing on what was done, just the general idea.

Thank you for this. I like that it's small enough to be motivational instead of being complex and intimidating.

World needs more of these for other complex topics.

I like the fact that it can generate terraform configurations.

Good concise article. Is there a tool to create such figures. They look really neat.

Interesting. I would love to see a similar article on memory management in Zig.

How do you calculate fat percentage and muscle mass. Is there a way that does not involve expensive equipment?

Biggest blocker for me is not being able to use WebView.

Issue https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/730 has been open for 2+ years with no solution.

It would be nice to know how big of a challenge this is or if there is a plan to solve it at all.

True. But AFAIK gitlab.com doesn't limit number of members for a project.

I really like where this is going. I'm seriously considering their phone. Only doubt I have is not knowing what battery life would be like.

I genuinely checked if today is April 1st.

This is one of the blockers for me as well. It can't embed web pages inside Flutter widgets.

How does this compare to TunnelBear [1]?

- TunnelBear is a bit more expensive (4.99$/mo, paid annually vs 4$/mo).

- TunnelBear supports up to 5 connections per account vs 2.

I use TunnelBear regularly for my browser and phone. Both works great.

My subscription is going to expire soon and I'll be open to try other VPN providers, not that there is anything wrong with TunnelBear. Any recommendations?

This site [2] has feature comparisons but experience using VPN services is another story.

[1] https://www.tunnelbear.com/ [2] https://thatoneprivacysite.net/vpn-section/