sadgit
Re:The magic of asyncio explained
on Tuesday August 07, 2018 @10:42PM (#17712823)
I’m still bummed that Python took this direction. Maybe introducing new keywords into the language for event loop concurrency was Python’s way of satisfying “explicit is better than implicit” but i can’s shake the feeling that callback passing and generator coroutines are a fad that is complex enough to occupy the imagination of a generation of programmers while offering little benefit compared to green threads.
Re:Kolmogorov Complexity and Our Search for Meaning
on Saturday August 04, 2018 @12:19AM (#17685360)
But you still seem to be in agreement that the implementation of the language has a neccesary overhead... printing the operator that indicates code would require another escape sequence, and the overhead of the operator to identify code would mean that some compressible strings dont benefit from compression.
Re:Kolmogorov Complexity and Our Search for Meaning
on Friday August 03, 2018 @09:45PM (#17684928)
> the shortest program that outputs "0" is "0".
Im tempted to debate this... in any programming language you need to use some space to differentiate a literal from code to be executed. So, according to Kolmogorov complexity, wouldn’t the shortest program to print a random number (or 0) be larger than that number?
Re:Kolmogorov Complexity and Our Search for Meaning
on Friday August 03, 2018 @09:26PM (#17684888)
Its a good point, but you wouldn’t have to extend the length of the string very much to be able to save space by including a prime number checker.
Re:The Blockchain Bubble Will Pop, What Next?
on Monday July 30, 2018 @01:06AM (#17642197)
Some links?
Re:The Blockchain Bubble Will Pop, What Next?
on Monday July 30, 2018 @01:00AM (#17642175)
Blockchains will allow people to collaborate on training a shared model. At somepoint it’ll be able to predict what it should learn next better than the people training it.
Re:The Blockchain Bubble Will Pop, What Next?
on Monday July 30, 2018 @12:51AM (#17642143)
Proof of work blockchains arent solving anything here, theyre a step further in the “do not trust” direction. However i think consortium chains may have potential.
Re:Observing the second law of thermodynamics in software
on Tuesday May 29, 2018 @12:24PM (#17180589)
The author talks about a piece of software as if it were a closed system, where disorder would inevitably increase. This is not the case, disorder in software can be decreased by doing work. However, the business requirements will inevitably become more complex over time, and there will come a point where the cost of adaptation of the software is higher than the cost of starting over with a design that better accomodates the current requirements. Inability to adapt is observed in ageing organisms also.
Re:Infant Deaths Fall Sharply in Africa with Routine Antibiotics
on Friday April 27, 2018 @02:24AM (#16938799)
How does a lower infant mortality rate indicate lower antibiotic misuse? Antibiotic misuse could be constant as a % of overall antibiotic use.
Re:Many Bitcoin Miners Are at Risk of Turning Unprofitable
on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @10:25AM (#16867625)
And whos going to create the blocks? It's still mining. However, tx fees might not be enough to pay for security in the network.
Re:MacOS finally gains external GPU support
on Saturday March 31, 2018 @10:47AM (#16723503)
And if you have 2 screens?
Re:Wall Street rethinks blockchain projects as euphoria meets reality
on Thursday March 29, 2018 @07:33PM (#16712221)
Blockchain does imply a consensus protocol, though. Thats what the block is for.
Re:Bitmain, the largest mining hardware company, made around $4B last ...
on Friday February 23, 2018 @06:23PM (#16450508)
Conspiracy of the second law
Re:Min – A smarter web browser
on Monday October 09, 2017 @01:43AM (#15431785)
It seems like this comment is a little understated. Maybe the commenter could think more about how to catch the attention if the persons he/she wishes to target. /s
Re:The Future of Go Summit – Ke Jie vs. AlphaGo
on Tuesday May 23, 2017 @03:45AM (#14399582)
Next challenge: a machine that can can beat a human using an equal amount of energy.
Re:Building a Completely Reversible Computer
on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @08:06PM (#14152912)
So, in a sense, heat is unrecoverable information.
Re:Building a Completely Reversible Computer
on Wednesday April 19, 2017 @04:31PM (#14151472)
Does this imply that physical entropy and informational entropy are the same?
Does it imply the computer would not give off heat? Or that a significant amount of the heat generated by a computer is due to information loss?
Re:Leslie Lamport: Video course on TLA+
on Tuesday March 21, 2017 @05:28AM (#13920789)
I havn't looked at the new video series, but when I was trying to get started with TLA+ using the Eclipse toolbox, i got stuck trying to define a behaviour spec for the model checker. Do you know of any good documentation for this? Thanks
Re:How we secretly introduced Haskell and got away with it
on Friday March 03, 2017 @12:25PM (#13784405)
Have you tried running tests from stack repl --test? Its so much faster. Id love if i could use file-watch and the repl together.
Re:The Rise of the Weaponized AI Propaganda Machine
on Tuesday February 14, 2017 @07:59PM (#13648849)
Theres alot of work to do on fleshing out what "blue team" meand and how one can meaningfully contribute to it.
Re:Ask HN: Will capitalism survive the robot revolution?
on Friday January 20, 2017 @12:53AM (#13441943)
Successful robots will multiply and scarcity will continue to exist its just a question of where. Energy and water for example. The world wont suddenly achieve equilibrium. Money will still be relevant to trade in things that are scarce. Therefore the focus of capitalism may switch but there will none the less be capitalism and plenty of it.
Re:I don't understand Python's Asyncio
on Monday October 31, 2016 @12:15AM (#12834260)
Totally agree. Its a damn shame, too, it fit so elegantly into a programming style that looked very analgous to the threading library. Look at Tornado's StackContext to see the kind of mess that callpack passing creates. Its a gc nightmare.
Re:Monks Who Spent Years Turning Themselves into Mummies While Alive
on Saturday October 08, 2016 @05:38PM (#12668846)
Is there any real spiritual value here? It appears to me to be misguided if the objective is to preserve oneself for later reanimation.
Re:Brain scans reveal how LSD affects consciousness
on Tuesday April 12, 2016 @02:30AM (#11477614)
Post the .tar.gz
Re:Secrets of Surveillance Capitalism
on Saturday March 12, 2016 @09:14PM (#11275809)
They're surrounded by confirmation that it is. Plus way too focused on the details.
Re:Lamdu – towards a new programming experience
on Sunday February 21, 2016 @06:17AM (#11144083)
Why? What does it have to offer?
Re:Git-blame-someone-else – Blame someone else for your bad code
on Sunday February 07, 2016 @07:57PM (#11055842)
I would love to be able to use left and right to skip quickly through revisions when viewing a blame, do you know anything for that?
Re:WebTorrent – BitTorrent over WebRTC
on Monday January 18, 2016 @02:30AM (#10923080)
Well, there's also Mozilla.
Re:Using Xmonad on OS X
on Tuesday January 12, 2016 @04:33PM (#10890555)
Doesn't have to be an issue with the appropriate PPA.
Re:IPv6: It's time to get on board
on Tuesday October 06, 2015 @11:29PM (#10344066)
The database will get bigger but I'm sure it will accommodate ranges rather than individual IPS.