ryantownsend
Please forgive the self-promotion but this was exactly the premise of a conference talk I gave ~18 months ago at performance.now() in Amsterdam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5felHJiACE
I really hope `RETURNING` support gets added to `MERGE` asap though (I believe it's been noted as a fairly trivial addition to come in future), then it'll be super powerful for doing bulk upserts that require post-processing.
The UK government are trying to pass the costs of remediation for other cladded buildings on to leaseholders who didn’t have any involvement in the design, build or sign-off of their buildings.
Some people are already being bankrupted through extortionate waking watches, mitigation and remediation bills and I’ve even heard that one person in my city (Leeds) has killed themselves due to the stress.
According to the select committee reviewing the Building Safety Bill, “the only people who believe leaseholders should pay are the government”.
The House of Lords has proposed an amendment to the bill stating that leaseholders won’t be made to pay (note: not forcing the tax payer to pay, just ensuring the leaseholders don’t) and the Housing Committee (namely MP Robert Jenrick) are rejecting this on the basis that the tax payer shouldn’t foot the bill.
We’re talking sums amounting to up to £100k being charged to people who paid similar amounts for their apartments in the first place! One affected block was built since Grenfell, so the entire ownership could effectively be in massive negative equity.
The government have put together a fund of £1bn for non-ACM cladding remediation, expecting that to cover ~600 buildings, but already over 2,700 buildings have applied and the estimated cost UK-wide is upwards of £15bn.
The whole thing is an utter shambles and people are stuck unable to sell their properties (stalling the first time buyer market as they can’t move up to other properties, and meaning they cannot move for work in a time when there are masses of redundancies) or even remortgage!
Campaign Monitor have the ability to take an API call and render into HTML using templates, this might do what you want: https://www.campaignmonitor.com/features/transactional-email...
(I'm unaffiliated with CM, just a customer)
There are some great stats on bounce rate / abandonment on WPOStats: https://wpostats.com/
This is my favourite:
> 53% of visits to mobile sites are abandoned after 3 seconds according to research from Google's DoubleClick.
One thing to note, to those stakeholders who are aware of web traffic stats, is that if a site uses client-side analytics (e.g. Google Analytics) and it hasn't loaded the analytics script by the time the user abandons the site, they won't be tracked, so the bounces won't be affected – it'll be like they were never there.
So ultimately, bounce rates in analytics tools can typically be significantly worse than reported when web performance is poor.
In SpeedCurve, for just around $8/mo per page/site you can set up daily synthetic checks for the business and its competitors, covering multiple profiles: mobile/3g, tablet/4g, desktop/fibre.
You can use both the metrics (Start Render, SpeedIndex, Hero Paint) [1] and the filmstrip videos to literally show them how they compare side-by-side [2] – this is super-powerful as it's so visual.
Disclaimer: I don't work for SpeedCurve, just a fan of the tool.
[1]: https://speedcurve.com/features/synthetic/#benchmark [2]: https://speedcurve.com/demo/video/?tests=180102_1T_d12fa882f...
This is specific to H2 Push
If they don't do this already, they probably will if they keep going down the AMP rabbit-hole.
If Apple were to implement this, I'd imagine it would be N x TB3/USB3 USB-C format ports, an ethernet port and maybe HDMI (though a dongle would possibly negate that – if 2.1 can be achieved that way)
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Is this as simple as setting up the same records on multiple providers and updating your nameservers to point to the different providers? Or is there more involved?
Are there any providers which will replicate records from your 'master' provider, or is this going to be manual?
Obviously this is a fairly basic example, but with more chaining comes more levels of specificity which makes for increasingly difficult changes and worse productivity.
[1]: https://web-payments.org/specs/#transactions
[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yelPlCVZLEE
[3]: https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2016/02/03/2016-platform...
We've even written notifications from our own applications to push into Slack, so we get notified on everything from continuous integration test results and deployments through to analytics and sales figures.
Would be great to see SPDY/HTTP2 support so the overhead of serving many small assets (i.e. typical website use) would be reduced.
I'm glad to finally see Layer Styles in Pixelmator, for years this feature has been preventing it from being comparable to Photoshop in the eyes of many. The forum was full of people requesting it, the argument was they wanted to "get it right" rather than rushing, which is valid, but it's not really any different from Sketch or Photoshop, so I'm not sure that was really the truth (maybe a Pixelmator dev could shine some light on that?), that said - it's here now so no complaints :-) excellent work chaps & chapettes!
ActionController::Live is merely an improvement of the HTTP Streaming functionality where the server will send HTML (or other data) down to the client part way through the request. So the server can send data, but not receive it from the client.
If you want to stream data to a client, then you can keep the connection open and just never "finish" the page. If you do this you'll have to be careful with concurrency etc, hence the requirement to use Thin/Rainbows/Puma not Unicorn.
A better comparison would probably be the new HTML5 Server-Sent Events (SSE) functionality. Though I'm not too familiar with that spec yet, so I can't comment on that.
e.g. so you could offload any frowned-upon functionality into external apps/services, and maybe promote or offer automated download & install functionality within your own app...
This is why most cloud services have a customisable limit on how many virtual servers can be booted automatically, a solution is yet to be found for protecting S3.