ryanpollock
Accelerating Vultr's Vision: The Independent Infrastructure Cloud
If you can relate, then I think you’ll enjoy my story.
Gonna fly now: why I've left Silicon Valley’s lions for Vultr
Fighting for the little guy: why this Google Cloud vet is joining DigitalOcean
you'll see your browsing history, which unless you have a preference turned off deep within settings, Google may then use to target advertising.
You'll see very different behavior in Chrome for Android and Chrome for iOS because the latter is required to use WebKit. There are some really big problems with the present situation. The web's fundamental promise of a cross-platform consistent runtime is basically broken, and consumers, developers, and businesses all suffer significant but mostly invisible harm.
Considering how much consumers have invested in the Apple ecosystem across multiple devices, it's not reasonable to expect that consumers will switch to Android. Apple's customers are locked in.
The question is whether it's OK for Apple to prevent competition within iOS.
Apple already got in trouble for price fixing - a violation of the Sherman antitrust act. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Apple_Inc.
Related to iOS and competition within it, see
http://fortune.com/2016/06/30/elizabeth-warren-apple-google/
http://www.thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/272399-time-to-prosecut...
Hopefully more to come from me on this topic...my channel here. https://medium.com/@ryanpollock
By virtue of Apple integrating the operating system with hardware, iOS has a defacto 100% monopoly on devices compatible with Apple's Ax series chips (e.g. A9 in iPhone 6s). There's nothing illegal about that.
The market for Ax series devices is now larger than the Intel-compatible PC market was at under consideration during the Microsoft antitrust case.
The question then is whether Apple's policies stifle innovation and harm consumers. I think the answer is "yes".