ryandonsullivan
ryandonsullivan on Hacker News
Re:Improving the WordPress User Experience
on Thursday July 28, 2016 @03:37PM (#12182589)
Thanks for sharing. The work our team put into this was pretty fantastic. Lots of real user tests and a number of real solid takeaways. Name, WordPress might be easier to use than Wix and Squarespace both
Re:SPF, DMARC, and DKIM: How to Keep Your Email Out of the Spam Folder
on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:42PM (#11947062)
Yeah, no doubt that a sketchy IP will basically negate any kind of authentication you have in place. Off to read your article...
Re:SPF, DMARC, and DKIM: How to Keep Your Email Out of the Spam Folder
on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:37PM (#11947023)
Cool tool. I'll have to play around with that and see how it goes. May end up adding it to the article :)
Re:SPF, DMARC, and DKIM: How to Keep Your Email Out of the Spam Folder
on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:36PM (#11947011)
That's a totally fair point. I'm not entirely sure why most third parties are still using ~ in their documentation but it still seems to be the norm. I do like the definitive nature of -all.
Re:SPF, DMARC, and DKIM: How to Keep Your Email Out of the Spam Folder
on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:35PM (#11946983)
Thanks for posting this. I know it's on a WordPress site but definitely applies to way more people than just that audience. I hope to build the article out even more and get super specific with various vendors like Mandrill, Amazon SES, Sendgrid, etc.
Re:Performance of WordPress Hosting Companies Compared
on Sunday August 11, 2013 @11:26PM (#6197506)
That's definitely fair feedback. One thing to keep in mind is, that with an outlier of 4 minutes and change, the graph would have to be blown up to a massive scale in order to see any variation in response times from the other hosts. Otherwise the other 6 hosts barely would have come up off the x-axis. The good news is that we have the data to produce exactly what you're talking about, but in terms of practicality for this article it was a little tough to justify. That said, I hear you and putting that together will be a fun new challenge.
Re:Performance of WordPress Hosting Companies Compared
on Sunday August 11, 2013 @11:07PM (#6197448)
Hi Sean, it surprised me enough that I ran the test multiple times and came up with the same result over and over. I connected with Ben over the weekend and would love to talk with you guys some more!
Re:Performance of WordPress Hosting Companies Compared
on Sunday August 11, 2013 @11:04PM (#6197433)
Another thing to look at is using nginx as a web server. It's a lot more lightweight than Apache. Paired with a solid SSD drive and varnish caching, and you can get some really great performance out of WordPress.
Re:Performance of WordPress Hosting Companies Compared
on Sunday August 11, 2013 @10:26PM (#6197340)
Yep. These are all great points. This is the first set of many many tests to come but it was good to get a baseline. If you check the timestamps of the full tests, you'll see that all of them were run back to back to back within the course of about 2 hours total time, so there shouldn't be much variation. That said, locking down ALL of the potential variables is definitely something I'm striving for long term.
Re:Performance of WordPress Hosting Companies Compared
on Sunday August 11, 2013 @10:23PM (#6197334)
For this particular article I didn't record any uptime. It's definitely a metric worth measuring, but I wanted to get super specific with this test. Lots more testing to come :)