ryanclarke
Re:Hugo 0.16 released
on Monday June 06, 2016 @01:05PM (#11848293)
Exciting! I can't wait to upgrade my site.
Re:Internal tools should be sold or killed
on Monday February 08, 2016 @08:58PM (#11062524)
Thank you for writing this article. I believe you have good ideas in it. Regards, Ryan.
Re:Hugo v0.15 releasedL Higher performance, Jekyll import, template im...
on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @11:10AM (#10627840)
Agree, and it can be even more pronounced. I tried to move to Octopress first and it took many seconds to generate my site (forget the fact that I never got it working right on Windows). Hugo is a few hundred milliseconds. That is a big difference and matters when I'm trying to rebuild 3-4 times a minute.
Re:Hugo v0.15 releasedL Higher performance, Jekyll import, template im...
on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @11:07AM (#10627826)
I just build locally and push the results to GitHub. Master branch is the generated site, hugo branch is for the code.
Re:Hugo v0.15 releasedL Higher performance, Jekyll import, template im...
on Wednesday November 25, 2015 @11:01AM (#10627793)
I love Hugo and use it for my site.
Speed didn't seem like an important feature until I was refreshing my 700 pages trying to find tweak a theme change. And now with the new 30+% speed increase in the `hugo server` command, it just got a lot better.
My favorite feature is the single, no-install, no-dependencies binary than works perfectly on all OSes. This is huge for Windows users. You may get lucky with the Ruby/Bundle madness of other static site generators on Linux, but Windows support is often lagging or non-existent. With Hugo, one binary and done.
Recommend.