rpns
The history for today is a bit of a mess really: https://www.githubstatus.com/history
Consider providing menu item icons for:
- The most commonly used menu items.
- Menu items whose icon is standard and well known.
- Menu items whose icon well illustrates what the command does.
If you use icons, don't feel obligated to provide them for all menu items. Cryptic icons aren't helpful, create visual clutter, and prevent users from focusing on the important menu items.
From: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/uxguide/cmd-...
https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs...
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-re...
No full detail though. Having said that, the second link is particularly interesting as it goes though various companies with comments about each.
From the OED (the entry has not been updated recently):
> Chiefly N. Amer. and elsewhere outside the U.K. In early use, a shop on a large scale, and dealing in a great variety of articles (see quot. 18082). Now, equivalent to the British use of shop n. 3.
> The use of the word in this sense has not become common in the U.K. except in Comb., as chain store n. at chain n. Compounds 3, department store n. at department n. 5 (see under the first elements), store detective n. at Compounds 1d(a), in which it still refers to a large shop.
Prototype pollution attack
Speculative Execution Exploit Performance Impacts - Describing the performance impacts to security patches for CVE-2017-5754 CVE-2017-5753 and CVE-2017-5715
https://access.redhat.com/articles/3307751
Controlling the Performance Impact of Microcode and Security Patches for CVE-2017-5754 CVE-2017-5715 and CVE-2017-5753 using Red Hat Enterprise Linux Tunables
> Intel believes its products are the most secure in the world and that, with the support of its partners, the current solutions to this issue provide the best possible security for its customers.
A rather bizarre statement of nothingness, and also an odd thing to say in a statement that just named AMD and ARM.
> Contrary to some reports, any performance impacts are workload-dependent, and, for the average computer user, should not be significant and will be mitigated over time.
It's interesting to note what it doesn't say – as it would seem to imply that for some workloads the performance impact will be significant.
If you look into the repo history you can see what it was doing before:
https://github.com/mozilla/addon-wr/blob/21ff53d2d5baab591d2...