rose_ann_

MoE model with 52 billion activated parameters means its more comparable to a (dense) 70b model and not a dense 405b model

There's always a bit of incredulity on peoples face when I tell them I enjoy reading science fiction books.

I understand why they would react that way.

Studies consistently show that young adult males, typically between the ages of 18 and 34, are the most avid readers of science fiction. Here are some statistics to support this claim:

1. A 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center found that among adults aged 18-29, 47% of men reported reading science fiction, compared to 34% of women in the same age group.

2. A 2015 study by the publishing industry website, Goodreads, analyzed the reading habits of over 40,000 users and found that 62% of male users aged 18-24 listed science fiction as one of their favorite genres, compared to 45% of female users in the same age group.

3. A 2013 survey by the market research firm, Nielsen, reported that 55% of males aged 18-34 read science fiction compared to 41% of females in the same age group.

All this statistics goes to prove why most people are surprised when I tell them I enjoy reading Sci-Fi, this statistics is what also pushed me to create this site, a website where both genders can enjoy reading Sci-Fi tailored to them whether they are twenty something or 60 something.

If prompted to tell a funny story, it inputs humor into the story. This sure is a funny beginning to the story

Put your efforts where your mouth is and go build your own "real competition" if you think its that easy.

My God, this is truly beautiful. If this were the blurb of an actual novel, I would unhesitatingly drop EVERYTHING to read it, and I say this as someone who reads an average of 1 novel every 3 days.

I never knew SOTA LLMs have gone this far. Wow!

Turns out the "We have no moat, and neither does OpenAI" memo was remarkably prescient, despite what the 'researchers' at SemiAnalysis claimed

By testing the code it returns (I mostly use it as a coding assistant) to see if it works. 95% of the time it does.

For technical questions, ChatGPT has almost completely replaced Google & Stack Overflow for me.

No. It solved it by (most of the time) giving the OP and I the answer to our queries, without us needing to wade through spammy SERP links.

Beautifully said.

So basically:

Apple lost the PC battle and won mobile,

Microsoft lost the mobile battle and (seemingly) is winning AI,

Google is losing the AI battle, but will win .... the Metaverse? Immersive VR? Robotics?

I understand, but isn't it a bit better to at least have some idea of where to start or even a general idea of what to do or what to avoid doing?

The posts on the site are the original posts. To seed the site so it wouldn't look like a wasteland, I emailed a few high value HN posters who had email addresses shown on their HN profiles and begged them to post a tip.

A few of them graciously obliged, and some of those probably told a colleague/acquaintance to post a tip as well.

It's why I love HN, there's more of a sense of community here.

Lol. Some of the wellbeing tips were really quite good though.

And I think you don't have the slightest idea what the commenter you're pretending to reply to, is actually talking about.

You might want to learn how the models work before making inflammatory comments.

To simplify the entire concept: Imagine you were an alien. You decide to work as an artist on earth. So you go on this thing the Humans call 'the internet', view millions of images & works of art, then start creating images & art pieces of your own based on the underlying rules you've gleaned from those millions of images you've viewed, without in any way keeping or saving a single copy of any of those images or artworks.

Would you call the above copyright infringement?

Or are you now claiming its 'copyright infringement' if anything or anyone apart from a human being views an image?