rojabuck
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/173407/sponsors/aeX...
It reads:
Do not censor the internet. Please rethink forcing ISPs to Block “Adult” Sites.
As part of the Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 the government has officially announced that Mobile and fixed line broadband providers in the United Kingdom will be forced to block all “adult” websites. This is a slippery slope which can be used to force ever increasing censorship on undesirable views.
The bill also introduces a new power that forces payment services (e.g. VISA, Mastercard) to withdraw support from non-compliant sites. The legislation uses the term “adult content” (i.e. open to interpretation and mission creep.) Dating, self-harm support, social networks, different political views and medical sites have historically been tagged as “adult content“. More at: http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/11/uk-government-c...
Presentations from QCon New York, CoreOS and Will HBase win the NoSQL race?
Scalability news – From the fluentd to penetration testing NoSQL stores
Dispatches On Scalability – August 5th 2014
Scalability news during the fortnight ending July 30th 2014
Such an utterly wonderful piece of engineering, the combination of so many advances from it's iron construction to its rotary screw propeller.
Why are people investing in new top level domains?
Ok. So domains have been much unchanged since the beginning. Well at least in respect to the 3 majors; .com, .org ,.net. Then there are some well established new-er TLD's i.e. .fr, .de, .co.uk etc... Now people (opportunists) want a domain like:somewhere.holidaywhy?If your SEO and your link backs point to a site which offers value then domain is surely pointless?If so, why are investors excited...
Our major usecase for mongo is returning entries in ordered distance from a location and / or within some radius of a location.
Support for such queries would be seriously useful.
I subscribe to "nothing to hide" but it would be nice to, at least, have some notification and callback over who had access to my personal details.
I don't really mid my information bing used to infer if pot-holes are more important to fix than water leaks. I do however object, without prior consent, for my details to be a way of supporting political movements /ideologies.
Tim Berners-Lee urges UK government to stop snooping bill
5000 x 60 x 60 x 24 = 432000000 Writes
50000 x 60 x 60 x 24 = 4320000000 Reads
(432000000/10000) x 0.01 = $432
(4320000000/10000) x 0.01 = $4320
Azure Total Cost For One Days Use: $4752
((5000/10) x 0.01) x 24 = $120
((50000/50) x 0.01) x 24 = $240
AWS Total Cost For One Days Use: $360
You are right that I don't take into account the bulk feature of azure reads & writes but this is down to bulk requests only being possible on a single partition at a time which in my personal experience (not exhaustive) is non-trivial to take advantage of.
Quite a lot can be done with smart use of hugely scalable simple key-value maps.
Reads per $0.01 = (50.60).60 = 180000
Writes per $0.01 = (10.60).60 = 36000
Assuming that you hit your usage is at 100% capacity then from a read prospective DynamoDB is half the price. Writes are much more expensive but many applications are heavily read oriented.
DynamoDB claims single digit millisecond reads, azure tables does not (from my experience.)
Azure tables have a maximum performance over a given partition table of 500 requests per second and over the whole account of 5,000 requests per second. DynamoDB does not state this.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazurestorage/archive/2010/05/...
To put this into context:
Assume a system with 5000 writes per second and 50000 reads here are the costs:
AWS Reads: $240 AWS Writes: $120 Aws Total: $360
Azure Reads: $4320 Azure Writes: $432 Azure Total: $4752
Seems like quite a difference for a decent sized read heavy application.
Game changed.