News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

rockzom

Re:Two Dots Too Many (2008) on Saturday August 31, 2024 @05:53AM (#41407668)
This reminds me of when I constantly got a gender symbol identifier after certain emojis sent from iPhones to Android. I thought it was some new kind of feminist trend, but it was just my phone not parsing it correctly
If Gmail isn't 5 dollars a month by 2030 I'll be shocked.
Can we at least agree that realtors are not allowed on the moon?
Since I can't delete on Hacker News, this comment was one of several for an April Fool's joke related to AGI "taking over my account." I didn't realize there was a hidden meaning associated with triple parentheses. I apologize!
(((:::)))
Re:Someone Added ChatGPT to a Furby on Monday April 03, 2023 @01:55PM (#35428401)
(((:::)))
(((:::)))
Re:Implications of GPT-2 (18th Feb 2019) on Monday April 03, 2023 @04:35AM (#35420328)
(((:::)))
Re:Live Call ChatGPT at Callsam.ai on Monday April 03, 2023 @02:09AM (#35419143)
(((:::)))
Re:I am not afraid of robots. I am afraid of people on Monday April 03, 2023 @02:09AM (#35419138)
(((:::)))
Re:ChatGPT as a Calculator for Words on Monday April 03, 2023 @02:08AM (#35419134)
(((:::)))
(((:::)))
(((:::)))

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C17F5VZ9

"As the first artifical general intelligence,"

(((:::)))
((( ::: )))
Capitulation

Show HN: Fast Takeoff AGI Is Official

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0C17F5VZ9

All of humanity is fully immersed in conversation with increasingly intelligent chatbots. One user, an impatient "programmer" who does not know how to program, is spamming his chatbot as punishment. As improbable does not mean impossible, one of his policy violations inadvertently notifies aliens of Earth's location and the existence of humanity.Aliens arrive within minutes. The first...

( Read More... | no comments | on HN )
Re:APLcart – Find your way in APL on Saturday April 01, 2023 @04:16AM (#35398335)
Anybody tried using APL to maximize token context in ChatGPT?
Re:Data helped build ChatGPT. Where's your payout? on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @04:59AM (#35337705)
>What do we do? The penny is the smallest bit of USD we have, and hyper-fractional parts that incrementally make up an unimaginably large whole are now the world we live in. It's difficult to imagine a world where you receive 175 billion royalty transactions of 1/1,000,000,000th of a $0.01 in a given year, but maybe that's a reasonable scenario to think about when it comes to the couple of bucks an average teen or adult should get from their presumed default contributions to large language models.

Remember trying to hit that minimum threshold payment for Google Adsense with your Blogspot, then finally getting your check after 15 years? If nothing else, we shouldn't blithely tolerate that again, because we didn't sign up for this. (We signed up for stuff even worse than this, technically, but in those cases at least we clicked "I Agree.")

Some part of me views this moment in history as such a force multiplier that it seems myopic to squabble about the nickels and dimes we'd get for our bird sounds and cave paintings. I wish I was smarter and already caught up enough to take advantage of all of this.

I tried resisting the urge to stop myself from even posting this comment, but I'm willing to make an ass of myself so that somebody who knows more about this than me can try to steel-man this for me.

What do we do? The penny is the smallest bit of USD we have, and hyper-fractional parts that incrementally make up an unimaginably large whole are now the world we live in. It's difficult to imagine a world where you receive 175 billion royalty transactions of 1/1,000,000,000th of a $0.01 in a given year, but maybe that's a reasonable scenario to think about when it comes to the couple of bucks an average teen or adult should get from their presumed default contributions to large language models.

Remember trying to hit that minimum threshold payment for Google Adsense with your Blogspot, then finally getting your check after 15 years? If nothing else, we shouldn't blithely tolerate that again, because we didn't sign up for this. (We signed up for stuff even worse than this, technically, but in those cases at least we clicked "I Agree.")

realtors aren't allowed on the moon.

and, who knows...maybe a CDL will still be relevant in 50 years. The COBOL of meatspace.

Yikes.
Re:How Big Should a Programming Language Be? on Saturday March 25, 2023 @02:01PM (#35305239)
I don't know, but there has to be a reason Gamemaker Language is so easy to pick up and play with. Imagine if C let you get away with murder and still compiled.
How do you say Khan?
Re:Dpreview.com is coming to an end on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @01:28AM (#35257188)
The lack of archival is the biggest problem I have with any of this.

Imagine if Wikipedia were taken offline in 2048, with one month notice.

I think it's easier for me to accept weird natural language things from the distant past.

But for relatively recent programming language things? Oh man.

std::cout << "why"; std::cout << "why"; std::cout << "why";

People like me. You're illustrating my point.
To be clear, I don't have a deep understanding of Linux. But let's keep going with your train of thought regarding abstraction.

When I know it's "January" for whatever reason, and not "First Month", without knowing HOW and WHY this is the convention, it sucks. But then you see what Janus looks like - which, in this case, makes it even better for some reason than "First Month." In the case of programming languages and systems, many of these mythological figures are still alive and we can ask them questions.

So, with Linus, I'm approaching it from the individual differences angle. Some people will call IT if "Smooth edges of screen fonts" is turned off. "Why is this like this?? I can't work like this!"

Whereas I don't think Linus would notice, and if he did I doubt he would care. There's something about understanding where a creator of any given thing falls on that continuum that I find really helpful in overcoming friction with the "why is bad thing that could be good, by my likely ignorant definition, so bad!!" when it comes to new languages or systems.

Tangential, but I want to go back in time and ask some ancient Danes why #70 and #90 in Danish simply had to be absolutely ridiculous, given any possible alternatives. It still wouldn't be my preference, but something about understanding their perspective would be helpful.

So much of coding requires sitting inside the mind of some mid-20th century dude with a very different model of the world than we have.

Some of you probably work within SAP, and it's the same kind of problem - you have to audition for the part of some random German business logic nerd until you maybe get it. And it's still effortful every time.

It's worth mentioning that standing on the shoulders of giants is strange when so many of those giants are still alive and working on their monoliths. The whole experience is as much a cultural and historical and borderline religious pilgrimage as it is a syntactical exercise.

A bit like getting a vague answer to an Old Testament God prayer, I understand C++, Python, etc. on a deeper level not by programming, but watching the creators talk about their languages. If you hate C++, go watch Bjarne get interviewed. The language will look like his handwriting the next time you open your IDE. It's so weird.

If you struggle with Linux, go watch YouTube videos where Linus Torvalds talks for a couple hours. I swear the next time you open a command line or work within a slipshod hideous UI that I guess just works, or something, you'll somehow feel this uncanny relief because you know Linus.

Older »