News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

rival_elf

Re:Did 5G Kill the IMSI Catcher? on Sunday April 27, 2025 @02:20PM (#43813999)
Tangentially related, the latest major Android release supports updates from the modem with details about whenever your IMSI/IMEI/unencrypted SUCI are disclosed to the network (with support for some contextual information, e.g. which protocol message was it disclosed in), as well as insight into the in-use network cryptography configuration for different protocols.
Re:Did 5G Kill the IMSI Catcher? on Sunday April 27, 2025 @02:11PM (#43813942)
See also this 2019 in-depth primer on cellular attacks I wrote for EFF: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/announcing-gotta-catch...
Re:Did 5G Kill the IMSI Catcher? on Sunday April 27, 2025 @02:09PM (#43813922)
> Criminal IMSI catchers are pretty much dead,

This isn't true, there are major incidents related to IMSI-catchers going on globally right now. E.g. last week from Japan: https://newsonjapan.com/article/145466.php, https://commsrisk.com/amateur-detectives-find-numerous-fake-..., and mass arrests happening in Thailand related to the operation of them recently.

To see news related to them, search "Fake Base Stations" or "SMS Blaster", as this is how they're commonly referred to in the media now.

Other notable highlights from the last few years include: the news from Paris a few years ago where police detonated a car with an imsi-catcher in it because they thought it was a bomb, but actually the driver was being paid to send out sms spam via 2g downgrade attacks: https://commsrisk.com/paris-imsi-catcher-mistaken-for-bomb-w.... Also the attempt to disrupt the federal elections in the Phillippines using a kind of "SMS blaster" that takes advantage of unauthenticated emergency alert messages, so a step beyond the "classic" imsi catching attack that we haven't seen used in the wild before.

Re:The StingRay Is Why the 4th Amendment Was Written (2017) on Sunday December 29, 2019 @10:47PM (#21910673)
I work in the field of cell network security research and want to help clear up some misinformation I'm seeing in these comments.

First, I just want to highlight that reason cell site simulators (the more general term for StingRays/IMSI-catchers) exist is because cell phones cannot authenticate all messages coming from cell towers. I'm seeing some vague comments about "a lack of encryption", but it's primarily more of an authentication issue.

You can read more about why it's primarily an authentication issue + how some of the relevant types of cell network attacks work in this technical post I wrote for EFF: https://www.eff.org/wp/gotta-catch-em-all-understanding-how-...

There are some interesting proposals for fixing this lack of authentication using a certificate-based PKI system, the most promising being this paper from Purdue: https://relentless-warrior.github.io/index.php/publications/.... This solution is very far from production-ready, but it's a much-needed step in the right direction.