richartruddie

Embedded Evaluators, Democratic Coordination, Global Coordination and pacing are some of the parts that stood out.

The demand letters are still rolling in despite being labeled as a vexatious litigant by the central california courts. Now in this breakdown video everything from the search bar privacy lawsuits to the CIPA demand letters with a litigation filing in there is broken down and what to do if you have a cookie consent banner that is not respecting Viveks privacy. Take 30 minutes to learn and get protected against Viveks data privacy claims.

Just two days after fining LocateSmarter, the California Privacy Protection Agency has issued its second data broker enforcement action of the week.

On August 13, 2026, the CalPrivacy Board ordered Boston-based Cybba, Inc. to pay a $52,400 fine for failing to register with the state’s Data Broker Registry by the 2025 deadline. The company sells personal information—including geolocation data, internet activity data, and inferences—primarily to support targeted advertising. One of its services analyzes purchasing behavior signals to identify likely repeat customers and other high-intent buyers.

Breaking news just now in the privacy world out of California the first DROP Act penalty today August 11th has been made against a mid-west data broker with a $116,490 fine.

The banner is needed because I want to toggle settings depending on the website. A one size fits all model does not give agency and choice thats easy to adjust for a website visitor. Thats how I feel but you can call me biased.

Captain Compliance consent banners work but most do not and that is the issue but in time enforcement will make it that they will all work or else there will be consequences.

If you are like the thousands of other business owners who are getting hit with data privacy lawsuits and filing an insurance claim or going to your legal counsel to defend this you will want to read this advice on how to beat these meta-pixel lawsuits...Somewhere in your organization a general inbox, a registered agent, a front-desk mail pile there may already be an envelope from Vivek Shah. Thousands of businesses and nonprofits across the country have received one since Fall 2025: a demand letter alleging privacy violations and an ask for compensation because you have a faulty cookie banner or a search bar without proper disclosures set up on your website..... These claims are coming hot and heavy. JD Supra has the guide on how to defend and get these privacy lawsuits dismissed.

Cookie stuffing and false attribution on top of a privacy scandal has gotten Phia being talked about but not for the right reasons....

Serial Litigant Vivek Shah has been sending out not hundreds but thousands of privacy violation demands to business owners all across the USA. Thankfully Captain Compliance has been a solution to block these privacy lawsuits with their consent management and privacy tools. Now California Assembly is looking to amend the law as the Los Angeles, California court systems would be overwhelmed with these cases if they were to move forward with Vivek Shah as the plaintiff.

Two lawsuits. Two settlements. Seventeen and a half million dollars. And a media company that, by all external appearances, did exactly what hundreds of other digital publishers are doing right now — deploying advertising and analytics technology to monetize its audience — discovering that the legal infrastructure of digital publishing has fundamentally changed around it.

Privacy Software company covers rise in litigation.

Paper Shields and Stolen Data: How a Fake Compliance Empire and a 40-Minute Supply Chain Attack Left 40,000 People Exposed — and Silicon Valley Facing a Legal Reckoning.

Market leader in data privacy software is continuing the M&A trend with buyout talks under way.

Anthropic state sponsored attack used by operators who selected targets (technology corporations, financial institutions, chemical manufacturers, and government agencies) and provided campaign-level authorization at critical decision gates. Human involvement represented approximately 10-20% of total operational effort, concentrated at 4-6 critical decision points per campaign.

This new robot is going to be awesome but the 1X NEO is going to have some privacy risks that need to be addressed.

On October 8, 2025, California enacted the “Opt Me Out Act” (AB 566), the first U.S. law requiring web browsers that operate in California to ship an easy-to-find, built-in setting allowing users to send a universal opt-out preference signal (often implemented via Global Privacy Control, or “GPC”). When enabled, the browser signal instructs websites not to sell or share personal information, operationalizing California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA) opt-out rights at scale. The law authorizes the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) to adopt implementing regulations and takes effect January 1, 2027. This editorial explains what the law does (and does not) cover—especially the status of mobile browsers—how it interacts with existing universal opt-out regimes in states like Colorado and Connecticut, what it means for opt-out requests and DSAR workflows, and the practical pros and cons for businesses. Finally, it outlines why this shift is advantageous for enterprise privacy programs and how leading solutions such as CaptainCompliance.com can reduce risk and cost through automation.