restreitinho
The anxiety of algorithms
Re:I created a bot that blurts out marketing bullshit
on Sunday April 24, 2016 @07:53AM (#11559378)
Any ideas of how to improve it are welcome. Thanks.
I created a bot that blurts out marketing bullshit
The irritating thing that happens when you add #growthhacking to your tweets
Snapchat as a definition of life
If you love the stream, you gotta let it go
Gurus are just desperate to exist
The psychology of Game Of Thrones
The to-do list’s original sin
Don’t write to teach, write to learn
What beaches and microscopes can teach us about plans, details and human nature
Metaphors and frameworks as tools for thinking
What does the animal world teach us about management?
Social is not a silo, it’s a layer
The difference between “sorry” and a buzzword
Problem-solving is time-sensitive
Why self help will actually make us worse
The 5 stages of visceral change. Feedback welcome, does this happen to you too?
About Bit.ly For Feelings
Caterpillars as a strategy case study
Quality drives engagement, not the other way around
If Zuck is right, I’ll miss the humanity of sharing
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @04:26PM (#5481867)
Yeah I had a great input about skipping that number and focusing on, say, 30% of the total book. 30 pages in a 1000 pages book is nothing. I also find that process of skimming the following pages to get a feel of it quite effective. That's how I "went through" Tim Ferriss's "4-hour workweek", which quite frankly is not a book for me. Not sure if there are fans here, no harm intended.
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @07:38AM (#5478692)
Ok, it's a very good argument. Of course we as readers also have to add something, and our background is important; the more we open our minds I believe the better our criteria of interestingness will be. Today I read stuff 3 years ago I would have no patience to read, it's also an exercise in which you evolve. But you're using an example of a classic while I tried to focus on online articles and other contemporary books, in an era where there's always another stimulum. I say in response to this we must make choices, and "what am I getting from this?" is the way I found to help filter all this information. I'm glad it's not a fixed set of rules, because as your story exemplifies exceptions make much better stories.
Still regarding choices: Dan Brown sure can hook us in the first 30 pages, but we are the ones who choose if we want to read Dan Brown in the first place. It's yet another layer of discussion to add to this.
PS: I'm glad this subject isn't dead and dry and sparks such discussion. Wasn't expecting this at all.
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @07:22AM (#5478639)
Ohh ok. Well I can't speak on behalf of programming, which I tried learning but realized it wasn't really my thing. :(
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @07:19AM (#5478631)
I think that's what makes the character so intriguing. 90% impossible arguments of why he does the things he does but still you don't fail to be amazed.
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @07:18AM (#5478624)
I found it quite entertaining from the very beginning. Still haven't read the second one but it's on the list.
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @07:17AM (#5478622)
Ok, thanks.
Re:A new system for reading
on Tuesday April 02, 2013 @07:17AM (#5478620)
True. That's my issue with online filters, anyway. It kinda gets philosophical too because filters only act according to what we choose to filter. So a filter for the other side would be kind of a never-ending journey (but a very important one to achieve, regardless).
About emoticons and punctuation, I deal with that on a daily basis too. Ugh.