News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

reiz

First of all, thx for documenting the mogration. That is very interesting.

Your monthly bill is smaller now. But how many hours did you invest into the migration? And how many hours more per month do you put in maintenance? I mean you have to take care of security patches now and many more things.

You used AWS in the most expensive way. Of course its expensive if you use on demand offering. You can cut costs by using Spot instances for ECS. Another way is by using reserved instances for ECS. If you pay 3 years upfront, you can get discounts up to 75%. That works for ECS and RDS.

I'm running ZEIT.IO on AWS and I had similar problems. But I don't want to manage VMs. As soon I have to SSH into something, I have a ton of problems I don't want to deal with.

Re:Show HN: Aldi's Price Map on Thursday February 15, 2024 @01:36AM (#39379785)
That's a great map! If I would still live in the US, my wife would use that map every day :-)
This is a setup I'm using in all my Rails projects. Maybe you find it useful.
Re:Nginx as Forwarding Proxy on Thursday January 07, 2021 @10:48AM (#25672327)
Docker container pre-configured with Nginx as forwarding proxy. You can use it to either block all outgoing traffic and whitelist certain domains or allow all outgoing traffic and blacklist certain domains. Let me know if you find it useful!
Re:NSA OSS Technologies on Monday June 19, 2017 @06:25AM (#14585813)
That's nice to see the NSA is contributing to the OSS community. I just randomly picked one of the NSA GitHub repositories, analysed it with VersionEye (https://www.versioneye.com) and found already 25 security vulnerabilities. Who is the best person to contact in this case? Here is the security report: https://www.versioneye.com/user/projects/59479cd06725bd00123....
You could use the VersionEye Maven Plugin for that: https://github.com/versioneye/versioneye_maven_plugin. It checks your dependencies against a license whitelist on the VersionEye server and if there is a violation it breaks your build on your CI server. That way you can enforce a license policy continuously. It's much better than just checking licenses once a year ;-)

I'm working on VersionEye since a couple years, it's a similar project and I open sourced it last week: https://blog.versioneye.com/2016/06/28/versioneye-goes-open-.... I'm following Andrews activities since a while and like what he did with libraries.io. Great job! As both projects have a big overlap and are open source now I'm open for collaboration :)

Re:Libraries – Open Source Discovery Service on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @07:33AM (#9610608)
I'm crawling some famous C repos at GitHub for VersionEye. There are listed here: https://www.versioneye.com/C. And I integrated the biicode, a dependency manager for C/C++. The biicode packages are listed here: https://www.versioneye.com/biicode. Currently there are no tags like at libraries.io but maybe I will add tags and tag filters for browsing tags/categories.
Re:Ask HN: Which OS License you try to avoid? And why? on Monday March 23, 2015 @02:00PM (#9252364)
Everybody is an highly competitive field. Everybody wants to release as fast as possible. That's why everybody is using open source components. I know that everybody in the commercial field avoids GPL. Just curious which other licenses are on the blacklist of the some companies.
Re:Ask HN: Which OS License you try to avoid? And why? on Sunday March 22, 2015 @11:15AM (#9246992)
Thanks for your input and the link. Any other licenses beside GPL you try to avoid?
Re:Is There a Line at Berghain? on Sunday March 22, 2015 @10:27AM (#9246825)
Nice! That's what the world waited for :-)
Re:Ask HN: Do you need money? on Sunday March 22, 2015 @09:59AM (#9246744)
I guess he is from the BayArea and he don't like remote sessions :-)
Re:Open source license usage on GitHub on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:17PM (#9173702)
I wrote once a license crawler for VersionEye which recognises the most common licenses in README files on GitHub. But I didn't crawl whole GitHub! Only projects which are submitted in package managers and did not provide a license info on the package manager. I'm using it for example to complete license infos about RubyGem projects without a license on RubyGems.
Re:Open source license usage on GitHub on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:06PM (#9173609)
Very interesting blog post. I wouldn't have thought that so less projects on GitHub provide a proper license! I'm working on https://www.versioneye.com and we track currently more than 500K open source projects in package managers. I just did a quick lookup in our database about Ruby licenses. Currently we have licenses for 56803 Ruby projects (RubyGems) and 49842 of them are MIT! That means 87% of all Ruby projects who provide a license at all, provide an MIT license! I will do a couple more queries and write a blog post to this!
Cool page. Makes totally sense. I'm doing it the same way. And in addition I use VersionEye to get notified about new versions of open source libraries I'm using in my projects. That saves me a lot of time. By the way I'm the dude who started VersionEye.
Re:Creating a GEM – a handy step by step tutorial on Friday June 20, 2014 @09:52AM (#7920667)
Check out jeweler (https://www.versioneye.com/ruby/jeweler/2.0.1). It makes creating and managing a Gem much easier ;-) Since I know it, it is a must have in all of my Gem projects.

Older »