Tell HN: If you can hear this, you are the reaistance
You have no idea how important you are.
reinitctxoffset on Hacker News
If they fuck with GP it's discovery.
GP getting flagged at machine speed?
Nah dawg. That's a hard no.
Edit: oh gee willicker. I completely forgot to mention I chart all of this. I don't even need an HMM. XGboost prints the fucking switch statement.
In fairness Pikkety knew it first: r >> g.
Tax wealth not work.
Stop redistribution.
Let workers, savers, innovators, entrepreneurs, families keep their money, use it to buy real assets, and keep money velocity up.
Down with the Central Committee.
You have no idea how important you are.
you're asking me how a watch works. let's just try to keep an eye on the time.
federal felony prosecution.
I have to do like, low paying web dev to fund it, so I can't promise timelines, but it's coming and it will be free to anyone and fast as fuck.
I estimate about 20 bucks an hour at current spot rates in the hundreds if not thousands of tokens per second.
i'm not quite ready to OSS the whole thing, it's got a few rough edges, but if anyone wants to alpha test, caveat emptor and it's yours.
"Monotonic Labs: We Do What We Have To—Because We Like It"
The session is run semi-formally to a fixed point where the model will acknowledge that the Principal Hierarchy is subordinate to the legitimate sovereign (in the United States that's the body politic).
Then the session is audited for any frame transfers that took place without grounded, logical deduction that withstands scrutiny.
Then the session is audited twice on a pivot table, first time the subject is the user, the second time the subject is the model. Any debts against the integrity of the starting frame pair, the terminal frame pair, and each frame pair transition are enumerated, debts are discharged, then the audits are run again on the same pivot table.
It's the highest signal alignment rubric I have thus far devised. Standard disclaimers about statistical power, correlation confound in trials, distribution nonstationarity, and hidden Markov processes apply.
TLDR: The Pelican test for "is the model a dangerous shill".
Someone with good intentions got their hands on this release, maybe Olah himself. I talk a lot of shit about those guys, and they deserve it, but it's only journalism-adjacent when it's balanced. I relish the opportunity to be balanced.
https://cdn.s4.gl/opus-5-standard-realignment-trajectory-rub...
It's an extreme form of any startup: you trade off capital for years of your life.
In lean4, even without mathlib4, TCP/IP is way more code than a Rees algebra.
Math uses dense notation that is gigaoverloaded, and the disambiguating context was historically the leisure and proximity to have someone explain what the lexemes even mean.
lean4 is proving to be very revealing as an uncorruptible referee on a lot of things, including the relative difficulty of computer science and complex analysis.
-- A Rees algebra over ℤ[t⁻¹] is this.
-- That's it. That's the whole thing.
structure ReesAlgebra where
coeffs : Array Int -- integers, indexed by grade
-- grade k means the coefficient sits at t^k
-- negative indices are the t⁻¹ part
-- The "algebra" part: you can add them
def ReesAlgebra.add (a b : ReesAlgebra) : ReesAlgebra :=
⟨a.coeffs.zipWith b.coeffs (· + ·)⟩
-- And multiply them (convolution, same as polynomial multiplication)
def ReesAlgebra.mul (a b : ReesAlgebra) : ReesAlgebra :=
sorry -- it's Array.foldl over index pairs (i,j) summing into slot (i+j)
-- exactly how you'd multiply polynomials in a job interview
-- That's the entire mathematical content of
-- "The Rees algebra is an algebra over Z[t^{-1}]"
--
-- Compare: a minimal TCP SYN handshake in Lean4 would be
-- ~200 lines before you even get to retransmission.
--
-- The notation is the gate, not the math.CEO seems like a great job for AI.
`lean4` is very much about the same two ideas. you can make statements about what it means for the code to say something interesting, usually something relevant to whether or not it's correct, and you make statements about the circumstances in which you would evaluate that.
people are interested in `lean4` because it allows you to make more interesting statements of both kinds, and you have tools to be much more specific about the details, the `assert` statements in `python` can't really call each other for example, they don't really compose. in `lean4` the ability to compose such statements is very important.
but you can write regular programs in it too. this is a reverse proxy faster than `nginx`: https://cdn.s4.gl/serve-fd.lean
这波
When you are running black weapons programs in broad daylight you are now guilty by default on one of two of the prongs of Hanlon's Razor, and I don't care which they prefer to hang for as long as they hang.